Zeroing-masking is not permitted in this case. See the code comment for
how this is being dealt with.
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 62 f2 7d cf 92 04 08 vgatherdps \(%eax,%zmm1(,1)?\),%zmm0\{%k7\}\{z\}/\(bad\)
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 62 f2 7d 48 92 04 08 vgatherdps \(%eax,%zmm1(,1)?\),%zmm0/\(bad\)
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 62 f1 7c cf c2 c0 00 vcmpeqps %zmm0,%zmm0,%k0\{%k7\}\{z\}/\(bad\)
+[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 62 f1 7c cf 29 00 vmovaps %zmm0,\(%eax\)\{%k7\}\{z\}/\(bad\)
#pass
# vcmpeqps %zmm0, %zmm0, %k0{%k7} with EVEX.z set
.insn EVEX.0f 0xc2, $0, %zmm0, %zmm0, %k0{%k7}{z}
+
+ # vmovaps %zmm0, (%eax){%k7} with EVEX.z set
+ .insn EVEX.0f 0x29, %zmm0, (%eax){%k7}{z}
if (ins->vex.evex)
{
+
+ /* Zeroing-masking is invalid for memory destinations. Set the flag
+ uniformly, as the consumer will inspect it only for the destination
+ operand. */
+ if (ins->vex.zeroing)
+ ins->illegal_masking = true;
+
switch (bytemode)
{
case dw_mode: