We are used to generate these kinds of relocations by data directives.
Considering the following example,
.word (A + 3) - (B + 2)
The GAS will generate a pair of ADD/SUB for this,
R_RISCV_ADD, A + 1
R_RISCV_SUB, 0
The addend of R_RISCV_SUB will always be zero, and the summary of the
constants will be stored in the addend of R_RISCV_ADD/SET. Therefore,
we can always add the addend of these data relocations when doing relocations.
But unfortunately, I had heard that if we are using .reloc to generate
the data relocations will make the relocations failed. Refer to this,
.reloc offset, R_RISCV_ADD32, A + 3
.reloc offset, R_RISCV_SUB32, B + 2
.word 0
Then we can get the relocations as follows,
R_RISCV_ADD, A + 3
R_RISCV_SUB, B + 2
Then... Current LD does the relocation, B - A + 3 + 2, which is wrong
obviously...
So first of all, this patch fixes the wrong relocation behavior of
R_RISCV_SUB* relocations.
Afterwards, considering the uleb128 direcitve, we will get a pair of
SET_ULEB128/SUB_ULEB128 relocations for it for now,
.uleb128 (A + 3) - (B + 2)
R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128, A + 1
R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128, B + 1
Which looks also wrong obviously, the summary of the constants should only
be stored into the addend of SET_ULEB128, and the addend of SUB_ULEB128 should
be zero like other SUB relocations. But the current LD will still get the right
relocation values since we only add the addend of SUB_ULEB128 by accident...
Anyway, this patch also fixes the behaviors above, to make sure that no matter
using .uleb128 or .reloc directives, we should always get the right values.
bfd/
* elfnn-riscv.c (perform_relocation): Clarify that SUB relocations
should substract the addend, rather than add.
(riscv_elf_relocate_section): Since SET_ULEB128 won't go into
perform_relocation, we should add it's addend here in advance.
gas/
* config/tc-riscv.c (riscv_insert_uleb128_fixes): Set the addend of
SUB_ULEB128 to zero since it should already be added into the addend
of SET_ULEB128.
{
if (howto->pc_relative)
value -= sec_addr (input_section) + rel->r_offset;
- value += rel->r_addend;
+
+ switch (ELFNN_R_TYPE (rel->r_info))
+ {
+ case R_RISCV_SUB6:
+ case R_RISCV_SUB8:
+ case R_RISCV_SUB16:
+ case R_RISCV_SUB32:
+ case R_RISCV_SUB64:
+ case R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128:
+ value -= rel->r_addend;
+ break;
+ default:
+ value += rel->r_addend;
+ }
switch (ELFNN_R_TYPE (rel->r_info))
{
value = ENCODE_CITYPE_LUI_IMM (RISCV_CONST_HIGH_PART (value));
break;
- /* SUB_ULEB128 must be applied after SET_ULEB128, so we only write the
- value back for SUB_ULEB128 should be enough. */
- case R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128:
- break;
+ /* R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128 won't go into here. */
case R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128:
{
unsigned int len = 0;
if (uleb128_set_rel != NULL
&& uleb128_set_rel->r_offset == rel->r_offset)
{
- relocation = uleb128_set_vma - relocation;
+ relocation = uleb128_set_vma - relocation + uleb128_set_rel->r_addend;
uleb128_set_vma = 0;
uleb128_set_rel = NULL;
}
fix_new_exp (fragP, fragP->fr_fix, 0,
exp_dup, 0, BFD_RELOC_RISCV_SET_ULEB128);
exp_dup->X_add_symbol = exp->X_op_symbol;
+ exp_dup->X_add_number = 0; /* Set addend of SUB_ULEB128 to zero. */
fix_new_exp (fragP, fragP->fr_fix, 0,
exp_dup, 0, BFD_RELOC_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128);
free ((void *) exp_dup);