Valgrind detects the following error in a bunch of tests,
e.g. in gdb.base/foll-fork.exp.
==15155== VALGRIND_GDB_ERROR_BEGIN
==15155== Invalid read of size 8
==15155== at 0x55BE04: minimal_symbol_upper_bound(bound_minimal_symbol) (minsyms.c:1504)
==15155== by 0x3B2E9C: find_pc_partial_function(unsigned long, char const**, unsigned long*, unsigned long*, block const**) (blockframe.c:340)
==15155== by 0x3B3135: find_function_entry_range_from_pc(unsigned long, char const**, unsigned long*, unsigned long*) (blockframe.c:385)
==15155== by 0x4F5597: fill_in_stop_func(gdbarch*, execution_control_state*) [clone .part.16] (infrun.c:4124)
==15155== by 0x4FBE01: fill_in_stop_func (infrun.c:7636)
==15155== by 0x4FBE01: process_event_stop_test(execution_control_state*) (infrun.c:6279)
...
==15155== Address 0x715bec8 is 0 bytes after a block of size 2,952 alloc'd
==15155== at 0x4C2E2B3: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:836)
==15155== by 0x405F2C: xrealloc (common-utils.c:62)
==15155== by 0x55BA4E: xresizevec<minimal_symbol> (poison.h:170)
==15155== by 0x55BA4E: minimal_symbol_reader::install() (minsyms.c:1399)
==15155== by 0x4981C7: elf_read_minimal_symbols (elfread.c:1165)
...
This seems to be a regression created by:
commit
042d75e42c5572f333e0e06dabd3c5c4afab486c
Author: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
AuthorDate: Sat Mar 2 12:29:48 2019 -0700
Commit: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
CommitDate: Fri Mar 15 16:02:10 2019 -0600
Allocate minimal symbols with malloc
Before this commit, the array of 'struct minimal_symbol'
contained a last element that was a "null symbol". The comment in
minimal_symbol_reader::install was:
/* We also terminate the minimal symbol table with a "null symbol",
which is *not* included in the size of the table. This makes it
easier to find the end of the table when we are handed a pointer
to some symbol in the middle of it. Zero out the fields in the
"null symbol" allocated at the end of the array. Note that the
symbol count does *not* include this null symbol, which is why it
is indexed by mcount and not mcount-1. */
memset (&msymbols[mcount], 0, sizeof (struct minimal_symbol));
However, minimal_symbol_upper_bound was still based on the assumption
that the array of minsym is terminated by a minsym with a null symbol:
it is looping with:
for (i = 1; MSYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (msymbol + i) != NULL; i++)
Replace this NULL comparison by a logic that calculates how
many msymbol are following the msymbols from which we are starting from.
(Re-)tested on debian/amd64, natively and under valgrind.
gdb/ChangeLog
2019-03-24 Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* minsyms.c (minimal_symbol_upper_bound): Fix buffer overflow.
+2019-03-24 Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
+ Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
+
+ * minsyms.c (minimal_symbol_upper_bound): Fix buffer overflow.
+
2019-03-26 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
* gdb-gdb.py.in (StructMainTypePrettyPrinter.bound_img): New method.
CORE_ADDR
minimal_symbol_upper_bound (struct bound_minimal_symbol minsym)
{
- int i;
short section;
struct obj_section *obj_section;
CORE_ADDR result;
- struct minimal_symbol *msymbol;
+ struct minimal_symbol *iter, *msymbol;
gdb_assert (minsym.minsym != NULL);
other sections, to find the next symbol in this section with a
different address. */
+ struct minimal_symbol *past_the_end
+ = (minsym.objfile->per_bfd->msymbols.get ()
+ + minsym.objfile->per_bfd->minimal_symbol_count);
msymbol = minsym.minsym;
section = MSYMBOL_SECTION (msymbol);
- for (i = 1; MSYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (msymbol + i) != NULL; i++)
+ for (iter = msymbol + 1; iter != past_the_end; ++iter)
{
- if ((MSYMBOL_VALUE_RAW_ADDRESS (msymbol + i)
+ if ((MSYMBOL_VALUE_RAW_ADDRESS (iter)
!= MSYMBOL_VALUE_RAW_ADDRESS (msymbol))
- && MSYMBOL_SECTION (msymbol + i) == section)
+ && MSYMBOL_SECTION (iter) == section)
break;
}
obj_section = MSYMBOL_OBJ_SECTION (minsym.objfile, minsym.minsym);
- if (MSYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (msymbol + i) != NULL
- && (MSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (minsym.objfile, msymbol + i)
+ if (iter != past_the_end
+ && (MSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (minsym.objfile, iter)
< obj_section_endaddr (obj_section)))
- result = MSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (minsym.objfile, msymbol + i);
+ result = MSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (minsym.objfile, iter);
else
/* We got the start address from the last msymbol in the objfile.
So the end address is the end of the section. */