glsl: Fix incorrect optimization of instructions before discard statements.
authorEric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:25:04 +0000 (11:25 -0700)
committerEric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:17:01 +0000 (13:17 -0700)
The function was named "find_unconditional_discard", but didn't
actually check that the discard statement found was unconditional.
Fixes piglit glsl-fs-discard-04.

Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
src/glsl/opt_discard_simplification.cpp

index 7c2928d271cecd793a05f4cbfeeb393792555566..a19947ddd6c7ccdd3307b91de47d75e395e5efa4 100644 (file)
@@ -104,9 +104,23 @@ static ir_discard *
 find_unconditional_discard(exec_list &instructions)
 {
    foreach_list(n, &instructions) {
-      ir_discard *ir = ((ir_instruction *) n)->as_discard();
-      if (ir != NULL && ir->condition == NULL)
-        return ir;
+      ir_instruction *ir = (ir_instruction *)n;
+
+      if (ir->ir_type == ir_type_return ||
+         ir->ir_type == ir_type_loop_jump)
+        return NULL;
+
+      /* So far, this code doesn't know how to look inside of flow
+       * control to see if a discard later on at this level is
+       * unconditional.
+       */
+      if (ir->ir_type == ir_type_if ||
+         ir->ir_type == ir_type_loop)
+        return NULL;
+
+      ir_discard *discard = ir->as_discard();
+      if (discard != NULL && discard->condition == NULL)
+        return discard;
    }
    return NULL;
 }