PR c++/67184 (again)
authorPaolo Carlini <paolo@gcc.gnu.org>
Fri, 5 Jul 2019 18:03:05 +0000 (18:03 +0000)
committerPaolo Carlini <paolo@gcc.gnu.org>
Fri, 5 Jul 2019 18:03:05 +0000 (18:03 +0000)
/cp
2019-07-05  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>

PR c++/67184 (again)
PR c++/69445
* call.c (build_over_call): Devirtualize user-defined operators
coming from a base too.
(build_new_method_call_1): Do not devirtualize here.

/testsuite
2019-07-05  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>

PR c++/67184 (again)
PR c++/69445
* g++.dg/other/final4.C: New.

From-SVN: r273147

gcc/cp/ChangeLog
gcc/cp/call.c
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/final4.C [new file with mode: 0644]

index f24a096b9e84b9976b4b9072210b50e420e95fbf..05e455527afe95a0531fda3016a043c34495831f 100644 (file)
@@ -1,7 +1,16 @@
+2019-07-05  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
+
+       PR c++/67184 (again)
+       PR c++/69445
+       * call.c (build_over_call): Devirtualize user-defined operators
+       coming from a base too.
+       (build_new_method_call_1): Do not devirtualize here.
+
 2019-07-04  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>
 
        DR 1813
-       PR c++/83374 - __is_standard_layout wrong for a class with repeated bases.
+       PR c++/83374 - __is_standard_layout wrong for a class with repeated
+       bases.
        * class.c (check_bases): Set CLASSTYPE_NON_STD_LAYOUT for a class if
        CLASSTYPE_REPEATED_BASE_P is true.
 
index 0709325550568ff30615a8d9f72305abe8bcea8c..90116f4995747bbe2e4a34c3eb663c7e2e508613 100644 (file)
@@ -8241,10 +8241,17 @@ build_over_call (struct z_candidate *cand, int flags, tsubst_flags_t complain)
            return error_mark_node;
        }
 
-      /* See if the function member or the whole class type is declared
-        final and the call can be devirtualized.  */
+      /* Optimize away vtable lookup if we know that this
+        function can't be overridden.  We need to check if
+        the context and the type where we found fn are the same,
+        actually FN might be defined in a different class
+        type because of a using-declaration. In this case, we
+        do not want to perform a non-virtual call.  Note that
+        resolves_to_fixed_type_p checks CLASSTYPE_FINAL too.  */
       if (DECL_FINAL_P (fn)
-         || CLASSTYPE_FINAL (TYPE_METHOD_BASETYPE (TREE_TYPE (fn))))
+         || (resolves_to_fixed_type_p (arg, 0)
+             && same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p
+             (DECL_CONTEXT (fn), BINFO_TYPE (cand->conversion_path)))) 
        flags |= LOOKUP_NONVIRTUAL;
 
       /* [class.mfct.nonstatic]: If a nonstatic member function of a class
@@ -9845,17 +9852,6 @@ build_new_method_call_1 (tree instance, tree fns, vec<tree, va_gc> **args,
 
          if (call != error_mark_node)
            {
-             /* Optimize away vtable lookup if we know that this
-                function can't be overridden.  We need to check if
-                the context and the type where we found fn are the same,
-                actually FN might be defined in a different class
-                type because of a using-declaration. In this case, we
-                do not want to perform a non-virtual call.  */
-             if (DECL_VINDEX (fn) && ! (flags & LOOKUP_NONVIRTUAL)
-                 && same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p
-                 (DECL_CONTEXT (fn), BINFO_TYPE (binfo))
-                 && resolves_to_fixed_type_p (instance, 0))
-               flags |= LOOKUP_NONVIRTUAL;
               if (explicit_targs)
                 flags |= LOOKUP_EXPLICIT_TMPL_ARGS;
              /* Now we know what function is being called.  */
index 98ad88063c711b3c5dc407e0964837bb2ce8121a..33645b1f0538bf955fe85f3a40b31ab3a17cc260 100644 (file)
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
+2019-07-05  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
+
+       PR c++/67184 (again)
+       PR c++/69445
+       * g++.dg/other/final4.C: New.
+
 2019-07-04  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>
 
        DR 1813
-       PR c++/83374 - __is_standard_layout wrong for a class with repeated bases.
+       PR c++/83374 - __is_standard_layout wrong for a class with repeated
+       bases.
        * g++.dg/ext/is_std_layout3.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/ext/is_std_layout4.C: New test.
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/final4.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/final4.C
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..867ef38
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// PR c++/67184
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-fdump-tree-original"  }
+
+struct B
+{
+  virtual void operator()();
+  virtual operator int();
+  virtual int operator++();
+};
+
+struct D final : B { };
+
+void foo(D& d) { d(); int t = d; ++d; }
+
+// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "OBJ_TYPE_REF" 0 "original" } }