PR tree-optimization/17513
* cfgexpand.c (construct_init_block): Clear EDGE_EXECUTABLE
for successors of the entry block.
* gcc.dg/
20040916-1.c: New test.
From-SVN: r87632
+2004-09-17 Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
+
+ PR tree-optimization/17513
+ * cfgexpand.c (construct_init_block): Clear EDGE_EXECUTABLE
+ for successors of the entry block.
+
2004-09-17 Uros Bizjak <uros@kss-loka.si>
PR rtl-optimization/15187
construct_init_block (void)
{
basic_block init_block, first_block;
- edge e;
+ edge e = NULL, e2;
+
+ for (e2 = ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR->succ; e2; e2 = e2->succ_next)
+ {
+ /* Clear EDGE_EXECUTABLE. This flag is never used in the backend.
- for (e = ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR->succ; e; e = e->succ_next)
- if (e->dest == ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR->next_bb)
- break;
+ For all other blocks this edge flag is cleared while expanding
+ a basic block in expand_gimple_basic_block, but there we never
+ looked at the successors of the entry block.
+ This caused PR17513. */
+ e2->flags &= ~EDGE_EXECUTABLE;
+
+ if (e2->dest == ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR->next_bb)
+ e = e2;
+ }
init_block = create_basic_block (NEXT_INSN (get_insns ()),
get_last_insn (),
+2004-09-17 Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
+
+ PR tree-optimization/17513
+ * gcc.dg/20040916-1.c: New test.
+
2004-09-16 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
PR c++/17501
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+/* PR17513 - we hit a bug where EDGE_EXECUTABLE was not cleared on
+ successors of the entry block. This lead to a flow verification
+ error much later in the compilation (after gcse). */
+typedef unsigned char uint8;
+typedef unsigned int uint32;
+
+uint32 marker = 0;
+uint8 *buff = 0;
+uint32 bsize = 0;
+
+extern int foo (void);
+
+uint32
+bar (void)
+{
+ int len, d;
+
+ for (;;)
+ {
+ if (foo () == 0)
+ return (0);
+
+ switch (marker)
+ {
+ case 0xfe:
+ {
+ len |= (*buff++);
+ bsize -= 2;
+
+ while (len > 0)
+ {
+ d = *buff++;
+ len--;
+ }
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+