undo reversion

From-SVN: r84822

diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
index 189ff972bbd828c3a0baabc1c1392c1a795fe3d0..f34b38ece3c8d4784edb2eb4559dca189ac97328 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
@@ -60,6 +60,11 @@
        (add_conversions): Likewise.
        * semantics.c (finish_member_declaration): Adjust call to add_method.
 
+2004-07-15  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>
+
+       * cp-lang.c (cxx_types_compatible_p): To the middle-end,
+       references and pointers are compatible.
+
 2004-07-15  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@codesourcery.com>
 
        * decl.c (xref_basetypes): Refactor.

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c b/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
index 5f38fbb10257e8951f18d7ad9f96830ae36a2015..b6e933fede6f8b9ce75fd877d42fed3aafdb31b4 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
@@ -317,9 +317,23 @@ cp_var_mod_type_p (tree type, tree fn)
   return false;
 }
 
+/* This compares two types for equivalence ("compatible" in C-based languages).
+   This routine should only return 1 if it is sure.  It should not be used
+   in contexts where erroneously returning 0 causes problems.  */
+
 static int cxx_types_compatible_p (tree x, tree y)
 {
-  return same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (x, y);
+  if (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (x, y))
+    return 1;
+
+  /* Once we get to the middle-end, references and pointers are
+     interchangeable.  FIXME should we try to replace all references with
+     pointers?  */
+  if (POINTER_TYPE_P (x) && POINTER_TYPE_P (y)
+      && same_type_p (TREE_TYPE (x), TREE_TYPE (y)))
+    return 1;
+
+  return 0;
 }
 
 /* Construct a C++-aware pretty-printer for CONTEXT.  It is assumed