Re: [libre-riscv-dev] Introduction

diff --git a/29/02a56192277e3128b6bca06dd76c2c68a4a765 b/29/02a56192277e3128b6bca06dd76c2c68a4a765
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..51d48c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/29/02a56192277e3128b6bca06dd76c2c68a4a765
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+Return-path: <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>
+Envelope-to: publicinbox@libre-riscv.org
+Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:33:13 +0100
+Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=libre-riscv.org)
+       by libre-soc.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
+       (envelope-from <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>)
+       id 1jlAm8-0003Jk-Hi; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:33:12 +0100
+Received: from vps2.stafverhaegen.be ([85.10.201.15])
+ by libre-soc.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
+ (envelope-from <staf@fibraservi.eu>) id 1jlAm7-0003Je-Oi
+ for libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:33:11 +0100
+Received: from hpdc7800 (hpdc7800 [10.0.0.1])
+ by vps2.stafverhaegen.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176BC11C05AB
+ for <libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>;
+ Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:33:11 +0200 (CEST)
+Message-ID: <f248aa42dfb0d4be598e3253eaf8c8ae6f98b59b.camel@fibraservi.eu>
+From: Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu>
+To: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
+Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:33:04 +0200
+In-Reply-To: <CAPweEDws6xaaAEMQGbQJmcM7obGfKrvREmyu7mqP96SWXaR9rg@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CAC2bXD7coX-Y7fo=BDQ+_Ju3gsZqyJY3w1KS3SLy+UNE9o6Z9Q@mail.gmail.com>
+ <6FD98A7F-B751-48AE-8829-0CBD38F1CFF6@gmail.com>
+ <e4436780b9c80da269ddc9cc66ad8cb709d31183.camel@fibraservi.eu>
+ <CAPweEDws6xaaAEMQGbQJmcM7obGfKrvREmyu7mqP96SWXaR9rg@mail.gmail.com>
+Organization: FibraServi bvba
+X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-8.el7) 
+Mime-Version: 1.0
+X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23
+Subject: Re: [libre-riscv-dev] Introduction
+X-BeenThere: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Libre-RISCV General Development
+ <libre-riscv-dev.lists.libre-riscv.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/options/libre-riscv-dev>, 
+ <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/pipermail/libre-riscv-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev>, 
+ <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=subscribe>
+Reply-To: Libre-RISCV General Development
+ <libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>
+Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3050155510950342251=="
+Errors-To: libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org
+Sender: "libre-riscv-dev" <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>
+
+
+--===============3050155510950342251==
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
+       boundary="=-W+lPbr90WU5Q8LoDnHm4"
+
+
+--=-W+lPbr90WU5Q8LoDnHm4
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton schreef op di 16-06-2020 om 11:59 [+0100]:
+> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:51 AM Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu> wrote=
+:
+> > Cole Poirier schreef op ma 15-06-2020 om 18:09 [-0700]:
+> > >=20
+> > > Yes that=E2=80=99s precisely what inspired this idea, Luke and I were=
+ talking about Kanban and I started to think of ways we could enhance it to=
+ use all of the data from the bugzilla rest API.
+> >=20
+> > Have you guys validated gitlab ?
+>=20
+> yes we evaluated gitlab.
+> * from a security perspective it is a nightmare (vast amounts of codeand =
+involving arbitrary code execution)
+
+What security implication are you considering for a fully open source proje=
+ct ?
+You could not use the release feature of gitlab for example.
+
+> > It seems you guys are trying to reinvent the wheel. gitlab for exampleh=
+as issue boards, supports check lists in issues etc.
+>=20
+> yes it does.  the hassle associated with it unfortunately has alreadyelim=
+inated it from consideration.
+
+Isn't it time to reevaluate if people are planning to implement kanban boar=
+ds and other things on top of the bugzilla REST API?
+Developing, maintaining, auditing that code will also have cost implication=
+s.
+
+greets,
+Staf.
+
+
+--=-W+lPbr90WU5Q8LoDnHm4--
+
+
+
+--===============3050155510950342251==
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
+Content-Disposition: inline
+
+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KbGlicmUtcmlz
+Y3YtZGV2IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApsaWJyZS1yaXNjdi1kZXZAbGlzdHMubGlicmUtcmlzY3Yub3Jn
+Cmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0cy5saWJyZS1yaXNjdi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9saWJyZS1yaXNj
+di1kZXYK
+
+--===============3050155510950342251==--
+
+
+