is a high priority. therefore especially length-detection must be kept
brutally simple.
+**All evaluations point towards the original encoding proposed in the
+very first revision of [[ls001]] as it is clear that all other decoders
+are far too complex**. <a name="#sv_po9_ext2xx" />
+
# **superseded** alternative 32-64 encoding (1)
conflict to resolve: EXT90x and EXT232. they are indistinguishable.
else return 64
```
-# alternative hybrid 32-64 encoding (3) **current**
+# **revoked** alternative hybrid 32-64 encoding (3)
aim of this idea is to attempt simplification of area identification
and length. the 55-bit area is eliminated and may only be reintroduced
return True
```
-# alternative **no 32 encoding** 64-bit only (4) **current**
+# alternative **no 32 encoding** 64-bit only (4) **current** <a name="#sv_po9_ext2xx" />
this idea gets even simpler. the 55-bit area is eliminated and may only be
reintroduced by sacrificing parts of EXT200-263. however doing so **WILL** damage