A missing 'r' (or wrong 'e') register prefix needs to be complained
about if the template allows for a 64-bit register, not a 32-bit one.
I assume this was a copy-and-paste type of mistake
(from check_long_reg()).
+2016-07-04 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
+
+ * config/tc-i386.c (check_qword_reg): Correct register kind
+ checked.
+ * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-suffix-bad.s: Add q-suffix with
+ 16-bit register cases.
+ * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-suffix-bad.l: Adjust expectations.
+
+
2016-07-02 Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@imgtec.com>
* testsuite/gas/mips/ecoff@ld.d: Remove test.
/* Warn if the r prefix on a general reg is missing. */
else if ((i.types[op].bitfield.reg16
|| i.types[op].bitfield.reg32)
- && (i.tm.operand_types[op].bitfield.reg32
+ && (i.tm.operand_types[op].bitfield.reg64
|| i.tm.operand_types[op].bitfield.acc))
{
/* Prohibit these changes in the 64bit mode, since the
.*:15: Error: .*
.*:16: Error: .*
.*:17: Error: .*
+.*:19: Error: .*
+.*:20: Error: .*
+.*:21: Error: .*
+.*:22: Error: .*
orb %rax, (%rax)
orw %rax, (%rax)
orl %rax, (%rax)
+
+ pushq %ax
+ popq %ax
+ callq *%ax
+ jmpq *%ax