* extend.texi: ISO C99 is not a draft anymore.
* invoke.texi: ISO C++ is not a draft anymore.
* cpp.texi: __cplusplus is required by the ISO standard.
From-SVN: r33073
2000-04-11 Martin v. Löwis <loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
+ * extend.texi: ISO C99 is not a draft anymore.
+ * invoke.texi: ISO C++ is not a draft anymore.
+ * cpp.texi: __cplusplus is required by the ISO standard.
+
* extend.texi (-fthis-is-variable): Undocument.
* flags.h (warn_template_debugging): Remove declaration.
* gcc.1 (-fall-virtual, -fenum-int-equiv, -fthis-is-variable,
@item __cplusplus
@findex __cplusplus
-The draft ANSI standard for C++ used to require predefining this
-variable. Though it is no longer required, GNU C++ continues to define
-it, as do other popular C++ compilers. You can use @samp{__cplusplus}
-to test whether a header is compiled by a C compiler or a C++ compiler.
+The ISO standard for C++ requires predefining this variable. You can
+use @samp{__cplusplus} to test whether a header is compiled by a C
+compiler or a C++ compiler. The compiler currently uses a value of
+@samp{1}, instead of the value @samp{199711L}, which would indicate
+full conformance with the standard.
@item __STRICT_ANSI__
@findex __STRICT_ANSI__
special with the identifier @code{__FUNCTION__}.
GNU CC also supports the magic word @code{__func__}, defined by the
-draft standard for C-99:
+ISO standard C-99:
@display
The identifier @code{__func__} is implicitly declared by the translator
@itemx -fno-for-scope
If -ffor-scope is specified, the scope of variables declared in
a @i{for-init-statement} is limited to the @samp{for} loop itself,
-as specified by the draft C++ standard.
+as specified by the C++ standard.
If -fno-for-scope is specified, the scope of variables declared in
a @i{for-init-statement} extends to the end of the enclosing scope,
as was the case in old versions of gcc, and other (traditional)