update

diff --git a/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn b/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn
index eb57168bf8c6b1feed312c34c23e9231015c1ee4..8735c7392502e848d362fbb6e3d4d0d382d45c1d 100644 (file)
--- a/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn
+++ b/updates/022_2020feb14_openpower_eula_released.mdwn
@@ -111,8 +111,10 @@ simply *implementing* existing RISC-V Standards?", and he replied, "all
 of them".  I then asked, "how many of those projects are *innovating*,
 developing alternative extensions to what is dictated by the RISC-V
 Foundation?" With the answer being "none", *that* was the point at which
-he understood the extent of the problem, and how the RISC-V Foundation -
-and its members - are at risk of violating EU anti-trust legislation.
+he understood the extent of the problem, and (with the systematic failure
+to respond to in-good-faith requests to participate in innovation),
+how the RISC-V Foundation - and its members, by way of them having
+"voting power" - are at risk of violating EU anti-trust legislation.
 
 oops.