In its general form, REMAP is quite expensive to set up, and on some
implementations may introduce latency, so should realistically be used
only where it is worthwhile. Given that even with latency the fact
-that up to 127 operations can be requested to be issued (from a single
+that up to 127 operations can be Deterministically issued (from a single
instruction) it should be clear that REMAP should not be dismissed
for *possible* latency alone. Commonly-used patterns such as Matrix
Multiply, DCT and FFT have helper instruction options which make REMAP
-easier to use.
+easier to use
+
+*Programmer's note: with the exception
+of Indexed REMAP all of these helper instructions are static operands
+as this helps Hardware by keeping Schedules 100% Deterministic.
+Where this is inconvenient the SVSHAPE SPRs 0-3 may be written to directly,
+bearing in mind this may have additional latency on some implementations.*
There are four types of REMAP: