[Ada] Wrong resolution of 'access in protected subprogram
authorJavier Miranda <miranda@adacore.com>
Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:46:10 +0000 (15:46 -0400)
committerPierre-Marie de Rodat <derodat@adacore.com>
Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:42:44 +0000 (09:42 -0400)
gcc/ada/

* sem_attr.adb (Resolve_Attribute): Resolve overloaded
N_Selected_Component prefix of 'Access. Required to handle
overloaded prefixed view of protected subprograms.

gcc/ada/sem_attr.adb

index 80e8f099e37911f68682cb9696a35541f2536f3d..1a80e798eab91d09c4d1e29f8251a36a62ecc9aa 100644 (file)
@@ -11023,7 +11023,29 @@ package body Sem_Attr is
                end if;
 
                Resolve (Prefix (P));
-               Generate_Reference (Entity (Selector_Name (P)), P);
+
+               if not Is_Overloaded (P) then
+                  Generate_Reference (Entity (Selector_Name (P)), P);
+
+               else
+                  Get_First_Interp (P, Index, It);
+                  while Present (It.Nam) loop
+                     if Type_Conformant (Designated_Type (Typ), It.Nam) then
+                        Set_Entity (Selector_Name (P), It.Nam);
+
+                        --  The prefix is definitely NOT overloaded anymore at
+                        --  this point, so we reset the Is_Overloaded flag to
+                        --  avoid any confusion when reanalyzing the node.
+
+                        Set_Is_Overloaded (P, False);
+                        Set_Is_Overloaded (N, False);
+                        Generate_Reference (Entity (Selector_Name (P)), P);
+                        exit;
+                     end if;
+
+                     Get_Next_Interp (Index, It);
+                  end loop;
+               end if;
 
             --  Implement check implied by 3.10.2 (18.1/2) : F.all'access is
             --  statically illegal if F is an anonymous access to subprogram.