+2010-04-22 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
+
+ * elf.c (assign_file_positions_for_load_sections): Revert 2008-05-29
+ change. Tidy. Don't error on sections not allocated in segment.
+
2010-04-15 Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
* bfd-in.h (elf32_arm_fix_exidx_coverage): Add new flag:
&& ((this_hdr->sh_flags & SHF_TLS) == 0
|| p->p_type == PT_TLS))))
{
- bfd_signed_vma adjust = sec->vma - (p->p_vaddr + p->p_memsz);
+ bfd_vma adjust = sec->lma - (p->p_paddr + p->p_memsz);
- if (sec->vma < p->p_vaddr + p->p_memsz)
+ if (sec->lma < p->p_paddr + p->p_memsz)
{
(*_bfd_error_handler)
- (_("%B: section %A vma 0x%lx overlaps previous sections"),
- abfd, sec, (unsigned long) sec->vma);
+ (_("%B: section %A lma 0x%lx overlaps previous sections"),
+ abfd, sec, (unsigned long) sec->lma);
adjust = 0;
- }
- p->p_memsz += adjust;
-
- if (p->p_paddr + p->p_memsz != sec->lma)
- {
- /* This behavior is a compromise--ld has long
- silently changed the lma of sections when
- lma - vma is not equal for every section in a
- pheader--but only in the internal elf structures.
- Silently changing the lma is probably a bug, but
- changing it would have subtle and unknown
- consequences for existing scripts.
-
- Instead modify the bfd data structure to reflect
- what happened. This at least fixes the values
- for the lma in the mapfile. */
sec->lma = p->p_paddr + p->p_memsz;
}
+ p->p_memsz += adjust;
if (this_hdr->sh_type != SHT_NOBITS)
{
(_("%B: section `%A' can't be allocated in segment %d"),
abfd, sec, j);
print_segment_map (m);
- bfd_set_error (bfd_error_bad_value);
- return FALSE;
}
}
}
+2010-04-22 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
+
+ * ld-elf/extract-symbol-1sec.d: Update lma.
+ * ld-i386/alloc.d: Expect a warning, not an error.
+
2010-04-20 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
* ld-tic6x/data-reloc-global-rel.d,