re PR tree-optimization/46021 (3 tree-ssa tests XPASS almost everywhere)

	PR tree-optimization/46021
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on alpha*-*-*,
	i?86-*-*, x86_64-*-*.

From-SVN: r168635

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 1b0d6f59b97bfd64c85209cc2051eb29dfdd41b5..b7821c68955c4e7f7ea70d6001365d893e353725 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2011-01-10  Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
+
+       PR tree-optimization/46021
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on alpha*-*-*,
+       i?86-*-*, x86_64-*-*.
+
 2011-01-10  Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
 
        * PR tree-optimization/47141

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
index 1fc7e3ba2bbcec340e23f9a1d5df0ee3f24322a7..4a16a74dd0834c394080439f5518ab2f07c8d8d2 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
@@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ void test55 (int x, int y)
    that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST).  Fix this
    by teaching dom to look through && and register all components
    as true.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */