We had:
tree t = fold_vec_perm (type, arg1, arg2,
vec_perm_indices (sel, 2, nelts));
where fold_vec_perm takes a const vec_perm_indices &. GCC 4.1 apparently
required a public copy constructor:
gcc/vec-perm-indices.h:85: error: 'vec_perm_indices::vec_perm_indices(const vec_perm_indices&)' is private
gcc/fold-const.c:11410: error: within this context
even though no copy should be made here. This patch tries to work
around that by constructing the vec_perm_indices separately.
2018-01-16 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
gcc/
* fold-const.c (fold_ternary_loc): Construct the vec_perm_indices
in a separate statement.
From-SVN: r256740
+2018-01-16 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
+
+ * fold-const.c (fold_ternary_loc): Construct the vec_perm_indices
+ in a separate statement.
+
2018-01-16 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses):
else /* Currently unreachable. */
return NULL_TREE;
}
- tree t = fold_vec_perm (type, arg1, arg2,
- vec_perm_indices (sel, 2, nelts));
+ vec_perm_indices indices (sel, 2, nelts);
+ tree t = fold_vec_perm (type, arg1, arg2, indices);
if (t != NULL_TREE)
return t;
}