(set_attr "mode" "DI")
(set_attr "length" "1,1,2")])
+;; These can be created when a paradoxical subreg operand with an implicit
+;; sign_extend operator is reloaded. Because of the subreg, this is really
+;; a zero extend.
+;; ??? It might be possible to eliminate the need for these patterns by adding
+;; more support to reload for implicit sign_extend operators.
+(define_insn "*paradoxical_extendhidi2"
+ [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=d,d")
+ (sign_extend:DI
+ (subreg:SI (match_operand:HI 1 "memory_operand" "R,m") 0)))]
+ "TARGET_64BIT"
+ "*
+{
+ return mips_move_1word (operands, insn, TRUE);
+}"
+ [(set_attr "type" "load,load")
+ (set_attr "mode" "DI")
+ (set_attr "length" "1,2")])
+
+(define_insn "*paradoxical_extendqidi2"
+ [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=d,d")
+ (sign_extend:DI
+ (subreg:SI (match_operand:QI 1 "memory_operand" "R,m") 0)))]
+ "TARGET_64BIT"
+ "*
+{
+ return mips_move_1word (operands, insn, TRUE);
+}"
+ [(set_attr "type" "load,load")
+ (set_attr "mode" "DI")
+ (set_attr "length" "1,2")])
\f
;;
;; ....................