re PR other/5299 (then -> than fixes)

2002-01-11  Craig Rodrigues  <rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR other/5299
        * config/ns32k/ns32k.md: Fix spelling mistake of "than" in comments.
        * combine.c (force_to_mode): Same.
        * reload1.c (clear_reload_reg_in_use): Same.

From-SVN: r48780

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index bad4bcb3bd8d50854dc7fe5d88d6c63d919e4876..cefd2144fc8a332853579fb337fb2bd237123023 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2002-01-11  Craig Rodrigues  <rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+       PR other/5299
+       * config/ns32k/ns32k.md: Fix spelling mistake of "than" in comments.
+       * combine.c (force_to_mode): Same.
+       * reload1.c (clear_reload_reg_in_use): Same.
+
 2002-01-11  Nick Clifton  <nickc@cambridge.redhat.com>
 
        * config/arm/arm.c (arm_gen_constant): Correct test of 'remainder'

diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
index 7421a33d40fb9c65f356706a94c3a852c98825e4..32120e53ccf3ec7b302b6ddbaf368b66b5624b0a 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/combine.c
+++ b/gcc/combine.c
@@ -6974,7 +6974,7 @@ force_to_mode (x, mode, mask, reg, just_select)
        {
          int i = -1;
 
-         /* If the considered data is wider then HOST_WIDE_INT, we can't
+         /* If the considered data is wider than HOST_WIDE_INT, we can't
             represent a mask for all its bits in a single scalar.
             But we only care about the lower bits, so calculate these.  */
 

diff --git a/gcc/config/ns32k/ns32k.md b/gcc/config/ns32k/ns32k.md
index f7452ac627dd841222b3efdb2e07f585785d4ffa..6622df5b74cbc5b40cd94d4eae7a424eb3fa4614 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/config/ns32k/ns32k.md
+++ b/gcc/config/ns32k/ns32k.md
@@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@
 }")
 \f
 ;;; Index insns.  These are about the same speed as multiply-add counterparts.
-;;; but slower then using power-of-2 shifts if we can use them
+;;; but slower than using power-of-2 shifts if we can use them
 ;
 ;;; See note 1
 ;(define_insn ""

diff --git a/gcc/reload1.c b/gcc/reload1.c
index 22d3b3d0d9ab8455750a404050b8398fa1c37d8d..e1f1e4bd6ea9f264bcb633d8e5eadcccfd4876e1 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/reload1.c
+++ b/gcc/reload1.c
@@ -4313,7 +4313,7 @@ clear_reload_reg_in_use (regno, opnum, type, mode)
      excluding the intervals of of reload registers by them from the
      interval of freed reload registers.  Since we only keep track of
      one set of interval bounds, we might have to exclude somewhat
-     more then what would be necessary if we used a HARD_REG_SET here.
+     more than what would be necessary if we used a HARD_REG_SET here.
      But this should only happen very infrequently, so there should
      be no reason to worry about it.  */