i965/vue_map: Stop using GLbitfield types

Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_compiler.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_compiler.h
index 1b71c7f7f981c51c22d137f0f024c351cb942b77..16d4d0ec52591a6ad1f68b863c4ea0e907539665 100644 (file)
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_compiler.h
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_compiler.h
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ struct brw_vue_map {
     * map, and (b) actually written by the shader.  Does not include any of
     * the additional varying slots defined in brw_varying_slot.
     */
-   GLbitfield64 slots_valid;
+   uint64_t slots_valid;
 
    /**
     * Is this VUE map for a separate shader pipeline?
@@ -616,12 +616,12 @@ GLuint brw_varying_to_offset(const struct brw_vue_map *vue_map, GLuint varying)
 
 void brw_compute_vue_map(const struct gen_device_info *devinfo,
                          struct brw_vue_map *vue_map,
-                         GLbitfield64 slots_valid,
+                         uint64_t slots_valid,
                          bool separate_shader);
 
 void brw_compute_tess_vue_map(struct brw_vue_map *const vue_map,
-                              const GLbitfield64 slots_valid,
-                              const GLbitfield is_patch);
+                              uint64_t slots_valid,
+                              uint32_t is_patch);
 
 /* brw_interpolation_map.c */
 void brw_setup_vue_interpolation(struct brw_vue_map *vue_map,

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vue_map.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vue_map.c
index 0d8f6c700b68fa88f029fd703ce0b60e1e3be234..178a4e5ee839c4596b479b4694f7c7e89ec34d85 100644 (file)
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vue_map.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vue_map.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ assign_vue_slot(struct brw_vue_map *vue_map, int varying, int slot)
 void
 brw_compute_vue_map(const struct gen_device_info *devinfo,
                     struct brw_vue_map *vue_map,
-                    GLbitfield64 slots_valid,
+                    uint64_t slots_valid,
                     bool separate)
 {
    /* Keep using the packed/contiguous layout on old hardware - we only need
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ brw_compute_vue_map(const struct gen_device_info *devinfo,
     * However, it may be output by transform feedback, and we'd rather not
     * recompute state when TF changes, so we just always include it.
     */
-   GLbitfield64 builtins = slots_valid & BITFIELD64_MASK(VARYING_SLOT_VAR0);
+   uint64_t builtins = slots_valid & BITFIELD64_MASK(VARYING_SLOT_VAR0);
    while (builtins != 0) {
       const int varying = ffsll(builtins) - 1;
       if (vue_map->varying_to_slot[varying] == -1) {
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ brw_compute_vue_map(const struct gen_device_info *devinfo,
    }
 
    const int first_generic_slot = slot;
-   GLbitfield64 generics = slots_valid & ~BITFIELD64_MASK(VARYING_SLOT_VAR0);
+   uint64_t generics = slots_valid & ~BITFIELD64_MASK(VARYING_SLOT_VAR0);
    while (generics != 0) {
       const int varying = ffsll(generics) - 1;
       if (separate) {
@@ -197,8 +197,8 @@ brw_compute_vue_map(const struct gen_device_info *devinfo,
  */
 void
 brw_compute_tess_vue_map(struct brw_vue_map *vue_map,
-                         GLbitfield64 vertex_slots,
-                         GLbitfield patch_slots)
+                         uint64_t vertex_slots,
+                         uint32_t patch_slots)
 {
    /* I don't think anything actually uses this... */
    vue_map->slots_valid = vertex_slots;