+2011-04-19 Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>
+
+ * ipa-cp.c (ipcp_update_profiling): asserting
+ scale_completement is not negative.
+
2011-04-19 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/48678
* ipa-cp.c (ipcp_update_profiling): Correct negative scale factor due
to insane profile data.
+2011-04-08 Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>
+
+ * ipa-cp.c (ipcp_update_profiling): Correct
+ negative scale factor due to insane profile data.
+
2011-04-08 Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>
* final.c (dump_basic_block_info): New function.
node->count = orig_node->count * scale / REG_BR_PROB_BASE;
scale_complement = REG_BR_PROB_BASE - scale;
- /* Negative scale complement can result from insane profile data
- in which the total incoming edge counts in this module is
- larger than the callee's entry count. The insane profile data
- usually gets generated due to the following reasons:
-
- 1) in multithreaded programs, when profile data is dumped
- to gcda files in gcov_exit, some other threads are still running.
- The profile counters are dumped in bottom up order (call graph).
- The caller's BB counters may still be updated while the callee's
- counter data is already saved to disk.
-
- 2) Comdat functions: comdat functions' profile data are not
- allocated in comdat. When a comdat callee function gets inlined
- at some callsites after instrumentation, and the remaining calls
- to this function resolves to a comdat copy in another module,
- the profile counters for this function are split. This can
- result in sum of incoming edge counts from this module being
- larger than callee instance's entry count. */
-
- if (scale_complement < 0 && flag_profile_correction)
- scale_complement = 0;
-
+ gcc_assert (scale_complement >= 0);
orig_node->count =
orig_node->count * scale_complement / REG_BR_PROB_BASE;
for (cs = node->callees; cs; cs = cs->next_callee)