# Verify that catchpoints for fork, vfork and exec don't trigger
# inappropriately. (There are no calls to those system functions
# in this test program.)
-#
-if ![runto_main] then {
- return
-}
-gdb_test "catch fork" "Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(fork\\)" \
- "set catch fork, never expected to trigger"
+proc_with_prefix test_no_break_on_catchpoint {} {
+ clean_restart break
+
+ if ![runto_main] then {
+ return
+ }
+
+ gdb_test "catch fork" "Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(fork\\)" \
+ "set catch fork, never expected to trigger"
-gdb_test "catch vfork" "Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(vfork\\)" \
- "set catch vfork, never expected to trigger"
+ gdb_test "catch vfork" "Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(vfork\\)" \
+ "set catch vfork, never expected to trigger"
-gdb_test "catch exec" "Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exec\\)" \
- "set catch exec, never expected to trigger"
+ gdb_test "catch exec" "Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exec\\)" \
+ "set catch exec, never expected to trigger"
+
+ gdb_continue_to_end
+}
-gdb_continue_to_end
+test_no_break_on_catchpoint
# Verify that GDB responds gracefully when asked to set a breakpoint
# on a nonexistent source line.