Thread-specific breakpoints: say "no longer in the thread list" instead of "gone".

It seems "gone" may confuse people, while that was exactly what it was
trying to avoid.  Switch to saying "no longer in the thread list",
which is really the predicate GDB uses.

gdb/
2013-10-07  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR breakpoints/11568
	* breakpoint.c (remove_threaded_breakpoints): Say "no longer in
	the thread list" instead of "gone".

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index a433b4669395e90824aa40dffcacbb9d4c68ed25..9c3d419631c31b19464c994e89179813d0055f86 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2013-10-07  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
+
+       PR breakpoints/11568
+       * breakpoint.c (remove_threaded_breakpoints): Say "no longer in
+       the thread list" instead of "gone".
+
 2013-10-06  Sergio Durigan Junior  <sergiodj@redhat.com>
 
        * NEWS: Mention new convenience variable $_exitsignal.

diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c
index b98ca9e100e3c8751d73c51042cde5abc4bd5d22..d3e9e496f09cee69dd68b1f6b70052a27b81efdf 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
+++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
@@ -2943,7 +2943,7 @@ remove_threaded_breakpoints (struct thread_info *tp, int silent)
          b->disposition = disp_del_at_next_stop;
 
          printf_filtered (_("\
-Thread-specific breakpoint %d deleted - thread %d is gone.\n"),
+Thread-specific breakpoint %d deleted - thread %d no longer in the thread list.\n"),
                          b->number, tp->num);
 
          /* Hide it from the user.  */