# BE Regfile confusion
+Defining how an element-addressable variable-width regfile is to
+be accessed is exceptionally difficult to pin down when conventions
+are used that start MSB numbering from zero (MSB0) rather than at the
+Industry-standard convention, LSB0. The confusion arises from the
+possibility of MSB0 numbering being potentially applicable to:
+
+* bits
+* bytes
+* register numbers
+* element numbers
+
+Then there is the completely separate issue of whether:
+
+* Memory should be the sole location where LE/BE byteswapping should
+ be applicable, Architecturally
+* Both the register file *and* Memory are, both, Architecturally,
+ LE/BE reorderable and thus **direct and explicit** control over
+ reordering over Memory **and the bytes inside regfile data**
+ is provided at the ISA Level.
+
+Simple-V has made the decision that providing programmers with explicit
+control over the byte-ordering when data is transferred in and out of
+the register files is too great, and has chosen to require that,
+**Architecturally**, the register file is to be treated as a Little-Endian
+byte-ordered SRAM with elements to be accessed as if in a Little-Endian
+Software Environment. This does **not** impact Memory-ordering in any way
+and it does **not** impact arithmetic operations.
+"Architecturally" is defined by Industry-standard convention to mean
+that how the Hardware is implemented is entirely down to the implementor,
+but that as far as *software* running on that hardware is concerned,
+"Architecturally" everything appears as described.
+
In the overview page is this:
| byte0 | byte1 | byte2 | byte3 | byte4 | byte5 | byte6 | byte7 |