indirect to the new ones. Consolidate the got and reloc information
in these situations. */
-static bfd_boolean
-elf64_alpha_merge_ind_symbols (struct alpha_elf_link_hash_entry *hi,
- PTR dummy ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+static void
+elf64_alpha_copy_indirect_symbol (struct bfd_link_info *info,
+ struct elf_link_hash_entry *dir,
+ struct elf_link_hash_entry *ind)
{
- struct alpha_elf_link_hash_entry *hs;
+ struct alpha_elf_link_hash_entry *hi
+ = (struct alpha_elf_link_hash_entry *) ind;
+ struct alpha_elf_link_hash_entry *hs
+ = (struct alpha_elf_link_hash_entry *) dir;
- if (hi->root.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
- return TRUE;
- hs = hi;
- do {
- hs = (struct alpha_elf_link_hash_entry *)hs->root.root.u.i.link;
- } while (hs->root.root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect);
+ /* Do the merging in the superclass. */
+ _bfd_elf_link_hash_copy_indirect(info, dir, ind);
/* Merge the flags. Whee. */
-
hs->flags |= hi->flags;
+ /* ??? It's unclear to me what's really supposed to happen when
+ "merging" defweak and defined symbols, given that we don't
+ actually throw away the defweak. This more-or-less copies
+ the logic related to got and plt entries in the superclass. */
+ if (ind->root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
+ return;
+
/* Merge the .got entries. Cannibalize the old symbol's list in
doing so, since we don't need it anymore. */
}
}
hi->reloc_entries = NULL;
-
- return TRUE;
}
/* Is it possible to merge two object file's .got tables? */
if (htab == NULL)
return FALSE;
- /* First, take care of the indirect symbols created by versioning. */
- alpha_elf_link_hash_traverse (htab, elf64_alpha_merge_ind_symbols,
- NULL);
-
if (!elf64_alpha_size_got_sections (info))
return FALSE;
elf64_alpha_adjust_dynamic_symbol
#define elf_backend_merge_symbol_attribute \
elf64_alpha_merge_symbol_attribute
+#define elf_backend_copy_indirect_symbol \
+ elf64_alpha_copy_indirect_symbol
#define elf_backend_always_size_sections \
elf64_alpha_always_size_sections
#define elf_backend_size_dynamic_sections \