+2017-05-03 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
+
+ * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment):
+ When all DRs have unknown misaligned do not always peel
+ when there is a store but apply the same costing model as if
+ there were only loads.
+
2017-05-03 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Revert
+2017-05-03 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
+
+ * gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/x86_64/costmodel-alignpeel.c: New testcase.
+
2017-05-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/79472
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+void func(double * __restrict__ v1, double * v2, unsigned n)
+{
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
+ v1[i] = v2[i];
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Alignment of access forced using peeling" "vect" } } */
dr0 = first_store;
}
- /* In case there are only loads with different unknown misalignments, use
- peeling only if it may help to align other accesses in the loop or
+ /* Use peeling only if it may help to align other accesses in the loop or
if it may help improving load bandwith when we'd end up using
unaligned loads. */
tree dr0_vt = STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (vinfo_for_stmt (DR_STMT (dr0)));
- if (!first_store
- && !STMT_VINFO_SAME_ALIGN_REFS (
- vinfo_for_stmt (DR_STMT (dr0))).length ()
+ if (STMT_VINFO_SAME_ALIGN_REFS
+ (vinfo_for_stmt (DR_STMT (dr0))).length () == 0
&& (vect_supportable_dr_alignment (dr0, false)
!= dr_unaligned_supported
- || (builtin_vectorization_cost (vector_load, dr0_vt, 0)
- == builtin_vectorization_cost (unaligned_load, dr0_vt, -1))))
+ || (DR_IS_READ (dr0)
+ && (builtin_vectorization_cost (vector_load, dr0_vt, 0)
+ == builtin_vectorization_cost (unaligned_load,
+ dr0_vt, -1)))))
do_peeling = false;
}