}
}
+ /* Does the declaration use the 'layout' keyword?
+ */
+ const bool uses_layout = qual->flags.q.pixel_center_integer
+ || qual->flags.q.origin_upper_left
+ || qual->flags.q.explicit_location;
+
+ /* Does the declaration use the deprecated 'attribute' or 'varying'
+ * keywords?
+ */
+ const bool uses_deprecated_qualifier = qual->flags.q.attribute
+ || qual->flags.q.varying;
+
+ /* Is the 'layout' keyword used with parameters that allow relaxed checking.
+ * Many implementations of GL_ARB_fragment_coord_conventions_enable and some
+ * implementations (only Mesa?) GL_ARB_explicit_attrib_location_enable
+ * allowed the layout qualifier to be used with 'varying' and 'attribute'.
+ * These extensions and all following extensions that add the 'layout'
+ * keyword have been modified to require the use of 'in' or 'out'.
+ *
+ * The following extension do not allow the deprecated keywords:
+ *
+ * GL_AMD_conservative_depth
+ * GL_ARB_gpu_shader5
+ * GL_ARB_separate_shader_objects
+ * GL_ARB_tesselation_shader
+ * GL_ARB_transform_feedback3
+ * GL_ARB_uniform_buffer_object
+ *
+ * It is unknown whether GL_EXT_shader_image_load_store or GL_NV_gpu_shader5
+ * allow layout with the deprecated keywords.
+ */
+ const bool relaxed_layout_qualifier_checking =
+ state->ARB_fragment_coord_conventions_enable;
+
+ if (uses_layout && uses_deprecated_qualifier) {
+ if (relaxed_layout_qualifier_checking) {
+ _mesa_glsl_warning(loc, state,
+ "`layout' qualifier may not be used with "
+ "`attribute' or `varying'");
+ } else {
+ _mesa_glsl_error(loc, state,
+ "`layout' qualifier may not be used with "
+ "`attribute' or `varying'");
+ }
+ }
+
if (var->type->is_array() && state->language_version != 110) {
var->array_lvalue = true;
}