+2018-11-21 Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
+
+ PR lto/87957
+ * g++.dg/lto/odr-1_0.C: Extend by mismatched enum.
+ * g++.dg/lto/odr-1_1.C: Extend by mismatched enum.
+ * g++.dg/lto/odr-2_0.C: New.
+ * g++.dg/lto/odr-2_0.C: New.
+ * g++.dg/lto/odr-3_1.C: New.
+ * g++.dg/lto/odr-3_1.C: New.
+
2018-11-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/87839
// PR c++/82414
// { dg-lto-do link }
+enum vals {aa,cc}; // { dg-lto-warning "6: type 'vals' violates the C\\+\\+ One Definition Rule" }
struct a { // { dg-lto-warning "8: type 'struct a' violates the C\\+\\+ One Definition Rule" }
struct b *ptr; // { dg-lto-message "13: the first difference of corresponding definitions is field 'ptr'" }
+ enum vals vals;
};
-void test(struct a *)
+void test(struct a *a)
{
+ a->vals = cc;
}
namespace {
- struct b;
+ struct b; // { dg-lto-message "type 'struct b' defined in anonymous namespace can not match across the translation unit boundary" }
}
-struct a {
- struct b *ptr;
-};
+enum vals {aa,bb,cc}; // { dg-lto-message "an enum with different value name is defined in another translation unit" }
+struct a { // { dg-lto-message "a different type is defined in another translation unit" }
+ struct b *ptr; // { dg-lto-message "a field of same name but different type is defined in another translation unit" }
+ enum vals vals;
+} a;
void test(struct a *);
int
main(void)
{
- test (0);
+ test (&a);
+ if (a.vals==aa)
+ return 1;
}
--- /dev/null
+// { dg-lto-do link }
+// { dg-lto-options { { -O0 -flto } }
+enum a {} b; // { dg-lto-warning "6: type 'a' violates the C\\+\\+ One Definition Rule" }
+int
+main(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
--- /dev/null
+class a { // { dg-lto-message "a different type is defined in another translation unit" }
+ int *b() const;
+};
+int *a::b() const { return 0; }
--- /dev/null
+// { dg-lto-do link }
+// { dg-lto-options { -O0 -flto } }
+
+typedef struct {
+ int a; // { dg-lto-message "the first difference of corresponding definitions is field 'a'" }
+} YYSTYPE; // { dg-lto-warning "3: warning: type ‘struct YYSTYPE’ violates the C\\+\\+ One Definition Rule" }
+union yyalloc { // { dg-lto-warning "7: type ‘union yyalloc’ violates the C\\+\\+ One Definition Rule" }
+ short yyss;
+ YYSTYPE yyvs; // { dg-lto-message "the first difference of corresponding definitions is field ‘yyvs’" }
+};
+void b() { yyalloc c; }
+
--- /dev/null
+typedef struct YYSTYPE { // { dg-lto-message ":16 a different type is defined in another translation unit" }
+} YYSTYPE;
+union yyalloc {
+ short yyss;
+ YYSTYPE yyvs; // { dg-lto-message "the first difference of corresponding definitions is field ‘yyvs’" }
+
+};
+void a() { yyalloc b; }
+