the testcase is another example - in addition to recent PR 93516 - where
the SRA access verifier is confused by the fact that get_ref_base_extent
can return different sizes for the same type, depending whether they are
COMPONENT_REF or not. In the previous bug I decided to keep the
verifier check for aggregate type even though it is not really important
and instead avoid easily detectable type-within-the-same-type situation.
This testcase is however a result of a fairly random looking type cast
and so cannot be handled in the same way.
Because the check is not really important for aggregates, this patch
simply disables it for non-register types.
2020-02-21 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
PR tree-optimization/93845
* tree-sra.c (verify_sra_access_forest): Only test access size of
scalar types.
testsuite/
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr93845.C: New test.
+2020-02-21 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
+
+ PR tree-optimization/93845
+ * tree-sra.c (verify_sra_access_forest): Only test access size of
+ scalar types.
+
2020-02-21 Andrew Stubbs <ams@codesourcery.com>
* config/gcn/gcn.c (gcn_hard_regno_mode_ok): Align VGPR pairs.
+2020-02-21 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
+
+ PR tree-optimization/93845
+ * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr93845.C: New test.
+
2020-02-21 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/rsqrt_1.c: New test.
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O1" } */
+
+struct g;
+struct h {
+ g *operator->();
+};
+class i {
+ void *a;
+ int b;
+
+public:
+ template <typename f> f j() { return *static_cast<f *>(this); }
+};
+struct k : i {};
+struct l : k {};
+struct m {
+ i n();
+ i o(l, l, int);
+};
+struct g {
+ void m_fn4(k);
+};
+h a;
+i b;
+i m::n() {
+ l c, d, e = o(d, c, 0).j<l>();
+ a->m_fn4(e);
+ return b;
+}
gcc_assert (offset == access->offset);
gcc_assert (access->grp_unscalarizable_region
|| size == max_size);
- gcc_assert (max_size == access->size);
+ gcc_assert (!is_gimple_reg_type (access->type)
+ || max_size == access->size);
gcc_assert (reverse == access->reverse);
if (access->first_child)