The calls to ptid_equal in ptid_lwp_p and ptid_tid_p that compare the
argument to minus_one_ptid and null_ptid are not necessary. The calls
in question are:
if (ptid_equal (minus_one_ptid, ptid)
|| ptid_equal (null_ptid, ptid))
return 0;
minus_one_ptid is { .pid = -1, .lwp = 0, .tid = 0 }
null_ptid is { .pid = 0, .lwp = 0, .tid = 0 }
If the ptid argument is either of them, the statements
return (ptid_get_lwp (ptid) != 0);
and
return (ptid_get_tid (ptid) != 0);
will yield the same result (0/false).
gdb/ChangeLog:
* common/ptid.c (ptid_lwp_p, ptid_tid_p): Remove comparison with
minus_one_ptid and null_ptid.
+2017-04-05 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
+
+ * common/ptid.c (ptid_lwp_p, ptid_tid_p): Remove comparison with
+ minus_one_ptid and null_ptid.
+
2017-04-05 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* warning.m4 (build_warnings): Remove -Wno-write-strings.
int
ptid_lwp_p (ptid_t ptid)
{
- if (ptid_equal (minus_one_ptid, ptid)
- || ptid_equal (null_ptid, ptid))
- return 0;
-
return (ptid_get_lwp (ptid) != 0);
}
int
ptid_tid_p (ptid_t ptid)
{
- if (ptid_equal (minus_one_ptid, ptid)
- || ptid_equal (null_ptid, ptid))
- return 0;
-
return (ptid_get_tid (ptid) != 0);
}