When adding libopcodes disassembler styling support for AArch64, it
feels like the results would be improved by having a new sub-mnemonic
style. This will be used in cases like:
add w16, w7, w1, uxtb #2
^^^^----- Here
And:
cinc w0, w1, ne
^^----- Here
This commit just adds the new style, and prepares objdump to handle
the style. A later commit will add AArch64 styling, and will actually
make use of the style.
As this style is currently unused, there should be no user visible
changes after this commit.
{
case dis_style_symbol: color = 32; break;
case dis_style_assembler_directive:
+ case dis_style_sub_mnemonic:
case dis_style_mnemonic: color = 33; break;
case dis_style_register: color = 34; break;
case dis_style_address:
{
case dis_style_symbol: color = 40; break;
case dis_style_assembler_directive:
+ case dis_style_sub_mnemonic:
case dis_style_mnemonic: color = 142; break;
case dis_style_register: color = 27; break;
case dis_style_address:
instructions. */
dis_style_mnemonic,
+ /* Some architectures include additional mnemonic like fields within the
+ instruction operands, e.g. on aarch64 'add w16, w7, w1, lsl #2' where
+ the 'lsl' is an additional piece of text that describes how the
+ instruction should behave. This sub-mnemonic style can be used for
+ these pieces of text. */
+ dis_style_sub_mnemonic,
+
/* For things that aren't real machine instructions, but rather
assembler directives, e.g. .byte, etc. */
dis_style_assembler_directive,