gfc_user_op *uop;
gfc_intrinsic_op i;
const char *gname;
+ gfc_typebound_proc* tbo;
+ gfc_expr* tb_base;
sym = NULL;
i = fold_unary_intrinsic (e->value.op.op);
+ /* See if we find a matching type-bound operator. */
+ if (i == INTRINSIC_USER)
+ tbo = matching_typebound_op (&tb_base, actual,
+ i, e->value.op.uop->name, &gname);
+ else
+ switch (i)
+ {
+#define CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(comp) \
+ case INTRINSIC_##comp: \
+ case INTRINSIC_##comp##_OS: \
+ tbo = matching_typebound_op (&tb_base, actual, \
+ INTRINSIC_##comp, NULL, &gname); \
+ if (!tbo) \
+ tbo = matching_typebound_op (&tb_base, actual, \
+ INTRINSIC_##comp##_OS, NULL, &gname); \
+ break;
+ CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(EQ)
+ CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(NE)
+ CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(GT)
+ CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(GE)
+ CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(LT)
+ CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(LE)
+#undef CHECK_OS_COMPARISON
+
+ default:
+ tbo = matching_typebound_op (&tb_base, actual, i, NULL, &gname);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* If there is a matching typebound-operator, replace the expression with
+ a call to it and succeed. */
+ if (tbo)
+ {
+ gcc_assert (tb_base);
+ build_compcall_for_operator (e, actual, tb_base, tbo, gname);
+
+ if (!gfc_resolve_expr (e))
+ return MATCH_ERROR;
+ else
+ return MATCH_YES;
+ }
+
if (i == INTRINSIC_USER)
{
for (ns = gfc_current_ns; ns; ns = ns->parent)
if (sym == NULL)
{
- gfc_typebound_proc* tbo;
- gfc_expr* tb_base;
-
- /* See if we find a matching type-bound operator. */
- if (i == INTRINSIC_USER)
- tbo = matching_typebound_op (&tb_base, actual,
- i, e->value.op.uop->name, &gname);
- else
- switch (i)
- {
-#define CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(comp) \
- case INTRINSIC_##comp: \
- case INTRINSIC_##comp##_OS: \
- tbo = matching_typebound_op (&tb_base, actual, \
- INTRINSIC_##comp, NULL, &gname); \
- if (!tbo) \
- tbo = matching_typebound_op (&tb_base, actual, \
- INTRINSIC_##comp##_OS, NULL, &gname); \
- break;
- CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(EQ)
- CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(NE)
- CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(GT)
- CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(GE)
- CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(LT)
- CHECK_OS_COMPARISON(LE)
-#undef CHECK_OS_COMPARISON
-
- default:
- tbo = matching_typebound_op (&tb_base, actual, i, NULL, &gname);
- break;
- }
-
- /* If there is a matching typebound-operator, replace the expression with
- a call to it and succeed. */
- if (tbo)
- {
- bool result;
-
- gcc_assert (tb_base);
- build_compcall_for_operator (e, actual, tb_base, tbo, gname);
-
- result = gfc_resolve_expr (e);
- if (!result)
- return MATCH_ERROR;
-
- return MATCH_YES;
- }
-
/* Don't use gfc_free_actual_arglist(). */
free (actual->next);
free (actual);
-
return MATCH_NO;
}
--- /dev/null
+! { dg-do run }
+!
+! PR 63733: [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] [OOP] wrong resolution for OPERATOR generics
+!
+! Original test case from Alberto F. MartÃn Huertas <amartin@cimne.upc.edu>
+! Slightly modified by Salvatore Filippone <sfilippone@uniroma2.it>
+! Further modified by Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+module overwrite
+ type parent
+ contains
+ procedure :: sum => sum_parent
+ generic :: operator(+) => sum
+ end type
+
+ type, extends(parent) :: child
+ contains
+ procedure :: sum => sum_child
+ end type
+
+contains
+
+ integer function sum_parent(op1,op2)
+ implicit none
+ class(parent), intent(in) :: op1, op2
+ sum_parent = 0
+ end function
+
+ integer function sum_child(op1,op2)
+ implicit none
+ class(child) , intent(in) :: op1
+ class(parent), intent(in) :: op2
+ sum_child = 1
+ end function
+
+end module
+
+program drive
+ use overwrite
+ implicit none
+
+ type(parent) :: m1, m2
+ class(parent), pointer :: mres
+ type(child) :: h1, h2
+ class(parent), pointer :: hres
+
+ if (m1 + m2 /= 0) call abort()
+ if (h1 + m2 /= 1) call abort()
+ if (h1%sum(h2) /= 1) call abort()
+
+end
+
+! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "overwrite" } }