/* Stop at types, decls, constants like copy_tree_r. */
else if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (code) == tcc_type
|| TREE_CODE_CLASS (code) == tcc_declaration
- || TREE_CODE_CLASS (code) == tcc_constant)
+ || TREE_CODE_CLASS (code) == tcc_constant
+ /* We can't do anything sensible with a BLOCK used as an
+ expression, but we also can't just die when we see it
+ because of non-expression uses. So we avert our eyes
+ and cross our fingers. Silly Java. */
+ || code == BLOCK)
*walk_subtrees = 0;
/* Cope with the statement expression extension. */
/* If the SAVE_EXPR has not been resolved, then evaluate it once. */
if (!SAVE_EXPR_RESOLVED_P (*expr_p))
{
- gcc_assert (TREE_TYPE (val) != void_type_node);
- /* The temporary may not be an SSA name as later abnormal and EH
- control flow may invalidate use/def domination. */
- val = get_initialized_tmp_var (val, pre_p, post_p, false);
+ /* The operand may be a void-valued expression such as SAVE_EXPRs
+ generated by the Java frontend for class initialization. It is
+ being executed only for its side-effects. */
+ if (TREE_TYPE (val) == void_type_node)
+ {
+ ret = gimplify_expr (&TREE_OPERAND (*expr_p, 0), pre_p, post_p,
+ is_gimple_stmt, fb_none);
+ val = NULL;
+ }
+ else
+ /* The temporary may not be an SSA name as later abnormal and EH
+ control flow may invalidate use/def domination. */
+ val = get_initialized_tmp_var (val, pre_p, post_p, false);
TREE_OPERAND (*expr_p, 0) = val;
SAVE_EXPR_RESOLVED_P (*expr_p) = 1;