that is as follows:
* EXT009, like EXT001 of Public v3.1, is **defined** as a 64-bit
- encoding
-* bit 6 if 0b1 is 100% for Simple-V augmentation (Public v3.1 1.6.3)
- "Defined Word" (aka EXT000-063), with the exception of 0x24000000
+ encoding. This makes Multi-Issue Length-identification trivial.
+* bit 6 if 0b1 is 100% for Simple-V augmentation of (Public v3.1 1.6.3)
+ "Defined Words" (aka EXT000-063), with the exception of 0x24000000
as a Prefix, which is a new RESERVED encoding.
* when bit 6 is 0b0 and bits 32-33 are 0b11 are **defined** as also
allocated to Simple-V
-* all other patterns are `RESERVED` for other purposes,
+* all other patterns are `RESERVED` for other purposes, outside the
+ scope of this RFC.
| 0-5 | 6 | 7 | 8-31 | 32:33 | Description |
|-----|---|---|-------|-------|---------------------------|
in SVP64, even if the instruction is non-Vectoriseable.
* Anything Vectorised-EXT000-063 is **automatically** being
requested as 100% Reserved for every single "Defined Word"
- (Public v3.1 1.6.3 definition). Vectorised-EXT001 is defined as illegal.
+ (Public v3.1 1.6.3 definition). Vectorised-EXT001 or EXT009
+ is defined as illegal.
* Any **future** instruction
added to EXT000-063 likewise, is **automatically**
assigned corresponding reservations in the SVP64:EXT000-063
**illegal attempt to put Scalar EXT004 into Vector EXT2nn**
-
| width | assembler | prefix? | suffix | description |
|-------|-----------|--------------|-----------|---------------|
| 32bit | unallocated | none | 0x10345678| scalar EXT0nn |
unintentionally
into `RESERVED` "Non-Vectoriseable" Encoding space.
+**illegal attempt to put Scalar EXT001 into Vector space**
+
+| width | assembler | prefix? | suffix | description |
+|-------|-----------|--------------|-----------|---------------|
+| 64bit | EXT001 | 0x04nnnnnn | any | scalar EXT001 |
+| 96bit | sv.EXT001 | 0x24!zero | EXT001 | scalar SVP64Single:EXT001 |
+| 96bit | sv.EXT001 | 0x25nnnnnn | EXT001 | vector SVP64:EXT001 |
+
+This becomes in effect an effort to define 96-bit instructions,
+which are illegal due to cost at the Decode Phase (Variable-Length
+Encoding). Likewise attempting to embed EXT009 (chained) is also
+illegal. The implications are clear unfortunately that all 64-bit
+EXT001 Scalar instructions are Unvectoriseable.
+
\newpage{}
# Use cases