This required is_hiz_depth_format to start returning true on S8_Z24 as
well, since that's the format we have here. The two previous callers
are only calling it on non-depthstencil formats.
This avoids us needing to have HiZ working on a new Z format
immediately upon exposing the format (particularly painful for
Z32_FLOAT_X24S8, which means all the fake packed depth/stencil paths).
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <chad.versace@linux.intel.com>
static bool brw_is_hiz_depth_format(struct intel_context *intel,
gl_format format)
{
- /* In the future, this will support Z_FLOAT32. */
- return intel->has_hiz && (format == MESA_FORMAT_X8_Z24);
+ if (!intel->has_hiz)
+ return false;
+
+ switch (format) {
+ case MESA_FORMAT_X8_Z24:
+ case MESA_FORMAT_S8_Z24:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
}
void brwInitVtbl( struct brw_context *brw )
brw_miptree_layout(intel, mt);
#endif
- if (intel->has_separate_stencil &&
- _mesa_is_depthstencil_format(_mesa_get_format_base_format(format))) {
+ if (_mesa_is_depthstencil_format(_mesa_get_format_base_format(format)) &&
+ (intel->must_use_separate_stencil ||
+ (intel->has_separate_stencil &&
+ intel->vtbl.is_hiz_depth_format(intel, format)))) {
mt->stencil_mt = intel_miptree_create(intel,
mt->target,
MESA_FORMAT_S8,