* dummy-frame.c (pc_in_dummy_frame): New function.
(generic_pc_in_call_dummy): Call pc_in_dummy_frame.
(find_dummy_frame): Update comment.
(generic_pop_current_frame): Use get_frame_type.
* dummy-frame.h (pc_in_dummy_frame): Declare.
* frame.c (set_unwind_by_pc): Use pc_in_dummy_frame.
(create_new_frame): Use pc_in_dummy_frame.
(get_prev_frame): Use pc_in_dummy_frame.
(frame_saved_regs_register_unwind): Use get_prev_frame.
(deprecated_generic_get_saved_register): Use get_prev_frame.
+2002-11-24 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
+
+ * dummy-frame.c (pc_in_dummy_frame): New function.
+ (generic_pc_in_call_dummy): Call pc_in_dummy_frame.
+ (find_dummy_frame): Update comment.
+ (generic_pop_current_frame): Use get_frame_type.
+ * dummy-frame.h (pc_in_dummy_frame): Declare.
+ * frame.c (set_unwind_by_pc): Use pc_in_dummy_frame.
+ (create_new_frame): Use pc_in_dummy_frame.
+ (get_prev_frame): Use pc_in_dummy_frame.
+ (frame_saved_regs_register_unwind): Use get_prev_frame.
+ (deprecated_generic_get_saved_register): Use get_prev_frame.
+
2002-11-23 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
* blockframe.c (find_frame_addr_in_frame_chain): Move function
/* Function: find_dummy_frame(pc, fp, sp)
Search the stack of dummy frames for one matching the given PC and
- FP/SP. Unlike PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY, this function doesn't need to
+ FP/SP. Unlike pc_in_dummy_frame(), this function doesn't need to
adjust for DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK. This is because it is only legal
to call this function after the PC has been adjusted. */
int
generic_pc_in_call_dummy (CORE_ADDR pc, CORE_ADDR sp, CORE_ADDR fp)
+{
+ return pc_in_dummy_frame (pc);
+}
+
+/* Return non-zero if the PC falls in a dummy frame.
+
+ The code below which allows DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK is for infrun.c,
+ which may give the function a PC without that subtracted out.
+
+ FIXME: cagney/2002-11-23: This is silly. Surely "infrun.c" can
+ figure out what the real PC (as in the resume address) is BEFORE
+ calling this function (Oh, and I'm not even sure that this function
+ is called with an decremented PC, the call to pc_in_call_dummy() in
+ that file is conditional on !CALL_DUMMY_BREAKPOINT_OFFSET_P yet
+ generic dummy targets set CALL_DUMMY_BREAKPOINT_OFFSET. True?). */
+
+int
+pc_in_dummy_frame (CORE_ADDR pc)
{
struct dummy_frame *dummyframe;
for (dummyframe = dummy_frame_stack;
generic_pop_current_frame (void (*popper) (struct frame_info * frame))
{
struct frame_info *frame = get_current_frame ();
-
- if (PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (frame->pc, frame->frame, frame->frame))
+ if (get_frame_type (frame) == DUMMY_FRAME)
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2002-22-23: Does this ever occure? Surely a dummy
+ frame will have already been poped by the "infrun.c" code. */
generic_pop_dummy_frame ();
else
(*popper) (frame);
extern CORE_ADDR dummy_frame_pc_unwind (struct frame_info *frame,
void **unwind_cache);
+/* Does the PC fall in a dummy frame?
+
+ This function is used by "frame.c" when creating a new `struct
+ frame_info'.
+
+ Note that there is also very similar code in breakpoint.c (where
+ the bpstat stop reason is computed). It is looking for a PC
+ falling on a dummy_frame breakpoint. Perhaphs this, and that code
+ should be combined?
+
+ Architecture dependant code, that has access to a frame, should not
+ use this function. Instead (get_frame_type() == DUMMY_FRAME)
+ should be used.
+
+ Hmm, but what about threads? When the dummy-frame code tries to
+ relocate a dummy frame's saved registers it definitly needs to
+ differentiate between threads (otherwize it will do things like
+ clean-up the wrong threads frames). However, when just trying to
+ identify a dummy-frame that shouldn't matter. The wost that can
+ happen is that a thread is marked as sitting in a dummy frame when,
+ in reality, its corrupted its stack, to the point that a PC is
+ pointing into a dummy frame. */
+
+extern int pc_in_dummy_frame (CORE_ADDR pc);
+
/* Return the regcache that belongs to the dummy-frame identifed by PC
and FP, or NULL if no such frame exists. */
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-11-08: The function only exists because of
dummy. (generic_call_dummy_register_unwind ought to have been called
instead.) */
gdb_assert (!(USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES
- && PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (frame->pc, frame->frame, frame->frame)));
+ && (get_frame_type (frame) == DUMMY_FRAME)));
/* Load the saved_regs register cache. */
if (frame->saved_regs == NULL)
while (frame && ((frame = frame->next) != NULL))
{
- if (PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (frame->pc, frame->frame, frame->frame))
+ if (get_frame_type (frame) == DUMMY_FRAME)
{
if (lval) /* found it in a CALL_DUMMY frame */
*lval = not_lval;
*unwind_register = frame_saved_regs_register_unwind;
*unwind_pc = frame_saved_regs_pc_unwind;
}
- else if (PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (pc, fp, fp))
+ else if (pc_in_dummy_frame (pc))
{
*unwind_register = dummy_frame_register_unwind;
*unwind_pc = dummy_frame_pc_unwind;
has previously set it. This is really somewhat bogus. The
initialization, as seen in create_new_frame(), should occur
before the INIT function has been called. */
- if (USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES && PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (fi->pc, 0, 0))
+ if (USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES && pc_in_dummy_frame (pc))
/* NOTE: cagney/2002-11-11: Does this even occure? */
type = DUMMY_FRAME;
else
initialization, as seen in create_new_frame(), should occur
before the INIT function has been called. */
if (USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES
- && PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (prev->pc, 0, 0))
+ && pc_in_dummy_frame (prev->pc))
prev->type = DUMMY_FRAME;
else
{