glcpp: Add test case for recently fixed loop-control underflow bug.
authorCarl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Mon, 3 Jun 2013 19:49:10 +0000 (12:49 -0700)
committerCarl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Mon, 3 Jun 2013 20:33:32 +0000 (13:33 -0700)
To trigger the bug, it suffices to have a line-continuation followed by
a newline and then a non-line-continuation backslash.

Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c [new file with mode: 0644]
src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c.expected [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c b/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..6a6f282
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* This test case is the minimal case to replicate the bug reported here:
+ *
+ * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65112
+ *
+ * To trigger the bug, there must be a line-continuation sequence
+ * (backslash newline), then an additional newline character, and
+ * finally another backslash that is not part of a line-continuation
+ * sequence.
+ */
+\
+
+/* \ */
diff --git a/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c.expected b/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c.expected
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9b3eb67
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+