}
/* Check that this frame's ID isn't inner to (younger, below, next)
- the next frame. This happens when frame unwind goes backwards.
- Since the sentinel frame isn't valid, don't apply this if this
- frame is entier the inner-most or sentinel frame. */
+ the next frame. This happens when a frame unwind goes backwards.
+ Since the sentinel frame doesn't really exist, don't compare the
+ inner-most against that sentinel. */
if (this_frame->level > 0
&& frame_id_inner (get_frame_id (this_frame),
get_frame_id (this_frame->next)))
- error ("This frame inner-to next frame (corrupt stack?)");
-
- /* Check that this and the next frame are different. If they are
- not, there is most likely a stack cycle. As with the inner-than
- test, avoid the inner-most and sentinel frames. */
- /* FIXME: cagney/2003-03-17: Can't yet enable this this check. The
- frame_id_eq() method doesn't yet use function addresses when
- comparing frame IDs. */
- if (0
- && this_frame->level > 0
+ error ("Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)");
+
+ /* Check that this and the next frame are not identical. If they
+ are, there is most likely a stack cycle. As with the inner-than
+ test above, avoid comparing the inner-most and sentinel frames. */
+ if (this_frame->level > 0
&& frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (this_frame),
get_frame_id (this_frame->next)))
- error ("This frame identical to next frame (corrupt stack?)");
+ error ("Previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)");
/* Allocate the new frame but do not wire it in to the frame chain.
Some (bad) code in INIT_FRAME_EXTRA_INFO tries to look along