--- /dev/null
+# coding=utf-8
+#
+# Copyright © 2011 Intel Corporation
+#
+# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
+# copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
+# to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
+# the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
+# and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
+# Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+#
+# The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
+# paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
+# Software.
+#
+# THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+# IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+# FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
+# THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+# LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
+# FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
+# DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
+
+import os
+import os.path
+import re
+import subprocess
+import sys
+
+sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), '..')) # For access to sexps.py, which is in parent dir
+from sexps import *
+
+def make_test_case(f_name, ret_type, body):
+ """Create a simple optimization test case consisting of a single
+ function with the given name, return type, and body.
+
+ Global declarations are automatically created for any undeclared
+ variables that are referenced by the function. All undeclared
+ variables are assumed to be floats.
+ """
+ check_sexp(body)
+ declarations = {}
+ def make_declarations(sexp, already_declared = ()):
+ if isinstance(sexp, list):
+ if len(sexp) == 2 and sexp[0] == 'var_ref':
+ if sexp[1] not in already_declared:
+ declarations[sexp[1]] = [
+ 'declare', ['in'], 'float', sexp[1]]
+ elif len(sexp) == 4 and sexp[0] == 'assign':
+ assert sexp[2][0] == 'var_ref'
+ if sexp[2][1] not in already_declared:
+ declarations[sexp[2][1]] = [
+ 'declare', ['out'], 'float', sexp[2][1]]
+ make_declarations(sexp[3], already_declared)
+ else:
+ already_declared = set(already_declared)
+ for s in sexp:
+ if isinstance(s, list) and len(s) >= 4 and \
+ s[0] == 'declare':
+ already_declared.add(s[3])
+ else:
+ make_declarations(s, already_declared)
+ make_declarations(body)
+ return declarations.values() + \
+ [['function', f_name, ['signature', ret_type, ['parameters'], body]]]
+
+
+# The following functions can be used to build expressions.
+
+def const_float(value):
+ """Create an expression representing the given floating point value."""
+ return ['constant', 'float', ['{0:.6f}'.format(value)]]
+
+def const_bool(value):
+ """Create an expression representing the given boolean value.
+
+ If value is not a boolean, it is converted to a boolean. So, for
+ instance, const_bool(1) is equivalent to const_bool(True).
+ """
+ return ['constant', 'bool', ['{0}'.format(1 if value else 0)]]
+
+def gt_zero(var_name):
+ """Create Construct the expression var_name > 0"""
+ return ['expression', 'bool', '>', ['var_ref', var_name], const_float(0)]
+
+
+# The following functions can be used to build complex control flow
+# statements. All of these functions return statement lists (even
+# those which only create a single statement), so that statements can
+# be sequenced together using the '+' operator.
+
+def return_(value = None):
+ """Create a return statement."""
+ if value is not None:
+ return [['return', value]]
+ else:
+ return [['return']]
+
+def break_():
+ """Create a break statement."""
+ return ['break']
+
+def continue_():
+ """Create a continue statement."""
+ return ['continue']
+
+def simple_if(var_name, then_statements, else_statements = None):
+ """Create a statement of the form
+
+ if (var_name > 0.0) {
+ <then_statements>
+ } else {
+ <else_statements>
+ }
+
+ else_statements may be omitted.
+ """
+ if else_statements is None:
+ else_statements = []
+ check_sexp(then_statements)
+ check_sexp(else_statements)
+ return [['if', gt_zero(var_name), then_statements, else_statements]]
+
+def loop(statements):
+ """Create a loop containing the given statements as its loop
+ body.
+ """
+ check_sexp(statements)
+ return [['loop', [], [], [], [], statements]]
+
+def declare_temp(var_type, var_name):
+ """Create a declaration of the form
+
+ (declare (temporary) <var_type> <var_name)
+ """
+ return [['declare', ['temporary'], var_type, var_name]]
+
+def assign_x(var_name, value):
+ """Create a statement that assigns <value> to the variable
+ <var_name>. The assignment uses the mask (x).
+ """
+ check_sexp(value)
+ return [['assign', ['x'], ['var_ref', var_name], value]]
+
+def complex_if(var_prefix, statements):
+ """Create a statement of the form
+
+ if (<var_prefix>a > 0.0) {
+ if (<var_prefix>b > 0.0) {
+ <statements>
+ }
+ }
+
+ This is useful in testing jump lowering, because if <statements>
+ ends in a jump, lower_jumps.cpp won't try to combine this
+ construct with the code that follows it, as it might do for a
+ simple if.
+
+ All variables used in the if statement are prefixed with
+ var_prefix. This can be used to ensure uniqueness.
+ """
+ check_sexp(statements)
+ return simple_if(var_prefix + 'a', simple_if(var_prefix + 'b', statements))
+
+def declare_execute_flag():
+ """Create the statements that lower_jumps.cpp uses to declare and
+ initialize the temporary boolean execute_flag.
+ """
+ return declare_temp('bool', 'execute_flag') + \
+ assign_x('execute_flag', const_bool(True))
+
+def declare_return_flag():
+ """Create the statements that lower_jumps.cpp uses to declare and
+ initialize the temporary boolean return_flag.
+ """
+ return declare_temp('bool', 'return_flag') + \
+ assign_x('return_flag', const_bool(False))
+
+def declare_return_value():
+ """Create the statements that lower_jumps.cpp uses to declare and
+ initialize the temporary variable return_value. Assume that
+ return_value is a float.
+ """
+ return declare_temp('float', 'return_value')
+
+def declare_break_flag():
+ """Create the statements that lower_jumps.cpp uses to declare and
+ initialize the temporary boolean break_flag.
+ """
+ return declare_temp('bool', 'break_flag') + \
+ assign_x('break_flag', const_bool(False))
+
+def lowered_return_simple(value = None):
+ """Create the statements that lower_jumps.cpp lowers a return
+ statement to, in situations where it does not need to clear the
+ execute flag.
+ """
+ if value:
+ result = assign_x('return_value', value)
+ else:
+ result = []
+ return result + assign_x('return_flag', const_bool(True))
+
+def lowered_return(value = None):
+ """Create the statements that lower_jumps.cpp lowers a return
+ statement to, in situations where it needs to clear the execute
+ flag.
+ """
+ return lowered_return_simple(value) + \
+ assign_x('execute_flag', const_bool(False))
+
+def lowered_continue():
+ """Create the statement that lower_jumps.cpp lowers a continue
+ statement to.
+ """
+ return assign_x('execute_flag', const_bool(False))
+
+def lowered_break_simple():
+ """Create the statement that lower_jumps.cpp lowers a break
+ statement to, in situations where it does not need to clear the
+ execute flag.
+ """
+ return assign_x('break_flag', const_bool(True))
+
+def lowered_break():
+ """Create the statement that lower_jumps.cpp lowers a break
+ statement to, in situations where it needs to clear the execute
+ flag.
+ """
+ return lowered_break_simple() + assign_x('execute_flag', const_bool(False))
+
+def if_execute_flag(statements):
+ """Wrap statements in an if test so that they will only execute if
+ execute_flag is True.
+ """
+ check_sexp(statements)
+ return [['if', ['var_ref', 'execute_flag'], statements, []]]
+
+def if_not_return_flag(statements):
+ """Wrap statements in an if test so that they will only execute if
+ return_flag is False.
+ """
+ check_sexp(statements)
+ return [['if', ['var_ref', 'return_flag'], [], statements]]
+
+def final_return():
+ """Create the return statement that lower_jumps.cpp places at the
+ end of a function when lowering returns.
+ """
+ return [['return', ['var_ref', 'return_value']]]
+
+def final_break():
+ """Create the conditional break statement that lower_jumps.cpp
+ places at the end of a function when lowering breaks.
+ """
+ return [['if', ['var_ref', 'break_flag'], break_(), []]]
+
+def bash_quote(*args):
+ """Quote the arguments appropriately so that bash will understand
+ each argument as a single word.
+ """
+ def quote_word(word):
+ for c in word:
+ if not (c.isalpha() or c.isdigit() or c in '@%_-+=:,./'):
+ break
+ else:
+ if not word:
+ return "''"
+ return word
+ return "'{0}'".format(word.replace("'", "'\"'\"'"))
+ return ' '.join(quote_word(word) for word in args)
+
+def create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, test_name,
+ pull_out_jumps=False, lower_sub_return=False,
+ lower_main_return=False, lower_continue=False,
+ lower_break=False):
+ """Create a test case that verifies that do_lower_jumps transforms
+ the given code in the expected way.
+ """
+ doc_lines = [line.strip() for line in doc_string.splitlines()]
+ doc_string = ''.join('# {0}\n'.format(line) for line in doc_lines if line != '')
+ check_sexp(input_sexp)
+ check_sexp(expected_sexp)
+ input_str = sexp_to_string(sort_decls(input_sexp))
+ expected_output = sexp_to_string(sort_decls(expected_sexp))
+
+ optimization = (
+ 'do_lower_jumps({0:d}, {1:d}, {2:d}, {3:d}, {4:d})'.format(
+ pull_out_jumps, lower_sub_return, lower_main_return,
+ lower_continue, lower_break))
+ args = ['../../glsl_test', 'optpass', '--quiet', '--input-ir', optimization]
+ test_file = '{0}.opt_test'.format(test_name)
+ with open(test_file, 'w') as f:
+ f.write('#!/bin/bash\n#\n# This file was generated by create_test_cases.py.\n#\n')
+ f.write(doc_string)
+ f.write('{0} <<EOF\n'.format(bash_quote(*args)))
+ f.write('{0}\nEOF\n'.format(input_str))
+ os.chmod(test_file, 0774)
+ expected_file = '{0}.opt_test.expected'.format(test_name)
+ with open(expected_file, 'w') as f:
+ f.write('{0}\n'.format(expected_output))
+
+def test_lower_returns_main():
+ doc_string = """Test that do_lower_jumps respects the lower_main_return
+ flag in deciding whether to lower returns in the main
+ function.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ complex_if('', return_())
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ declare_execute_flag() +
+ declare_return_flag() +
+ complex_if('', lowered_return())
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_returns_main_true',
+ lower_main_return=True)
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, input_sexp, 'lower_returns_main_false',
+ lower_main_return=False)
+
+def test_lower_returns_sub():
+ doc_string = """Test that do_lower_jumps respects the lower_sub_return flag
+ in deciding whether to lower returns in subroutines.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('sub', 'void', (
+ complex_if('', return_())
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('sub', 'void', (
+ declare_execute_flag() +
+ declare_return_flag() +
+ complex_if('', lowered_return())
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_returns_sub_true',
+ lower_sub_return=True)
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, input_sexp, 'lower_returns_sub_false',
+ lower_sub_return=False)
+
+def test_lower_returns_1():
+ doc_string = """Test that a void return at the end of a function is
+ eliminated.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ return_()
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ assign_x('a', const_float(1))
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_returns_1',
+ lower_main_return=True)
+
+def test_lower_returns_2():
+ doc_string = """Test that lowering is not performed on a non-void return at
+ the end of subroutine.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('sub', 'float', (
+ assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ return_(const_float(1))
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, input_sexp, 'lower_returns_2',
+ lower_sub_return=True)
+
+def test_lower_returns_3():
+ doc_string = """Test lowering of returns when there is one nested inside a
+ complex structure of ifs, and one at the end of a function.
+
+ In this case, the latter return needs to be lowered because it
+ will not be at the end of the function once the final return
+ is inserted.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('sub', 'float', (
+ complex_if('', return_(const_float(1))) +
+ return_(const_float(2))
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('sub', 'float', (
+ declare_execute_flag() +
+ declare_return_value() +
+ declare_return_flag() +
+ complex_if('', lowered_return(const_float(1))) +
+ if_execute_flag(lowered_return(const_float(2))) +
+ final_return()
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_returns_3',
+ lower_sub_return=True)
+
+def test_lower_returns_4():
+ doc_string = """Test that returns are properly lowered when they occur in
+ both branches of an if-statement.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('sub', 'float', (
+ simple_if('a', return_(const_float(1)),
+ return_(const_float(2)))
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('sub', 'float', (
+ declare_execute_flag() +
+ declare_return_value() +
+ declare_return_flag() +
+ simple_if('a', lowered_return(const_float(1)),
+ lowered_return(const_float(2))) +
+ final_return()
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_returns_4',
+ lower_sub_return=True)
+
+def test_lower_unified_returns():
+ doc_string = """If both branches of an if statement end in a return, and
+ pull_out_jumps is True, then those returns should be lifted
+ outside the if and then properly lowered.
+
+ Verify that this lowering occurs during the same pass as the
+ lowering of other returns by checking that extra temporary
+ variables aren't generated.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ complex_if('a', return_()) +
+ simple_if('b', simple_if('c', return_(), return_()))
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ declare_execute_flag() +
+ declare_return_flag() +
+ complex_if('a', lowered_return()) +
+ if_execute_flag(simple_if('b', (simple_if('c', [], []) +
+ lowered_return())))
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_unified_returns',
+ lower_main_return=True, pull_out_jumps=True)
+
+def test_lower_pulled_out_jump():
+ doc_string = """If one branch of an if ends in a jump, and control cannot
+ fall out the bottom of the other branch, and pull_out_jumps is
+ True, then the jump is lifted outside the if.
+
+ Verify that this lowering occurs during the same pass as the
+ lowering of other jumps by checking that extra temporary
+ variables aren't generated.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ complex_if('a', return_()) +
+ loop(simple_if('b', simple_if('c', break_(), continue_()),
+ return_())) +
+ assign_x('d', const_float(1))
+ ))
+ # Note: optimization produces two other effects: the break
+ # gets lifted out of the if statements, and the code after the
+ # loop gets guarded so that it only executes if the return
+ # flag is clear.
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ declare_execute_flag() +
+ declare_return_flag() +
+ complex_if('a', lowered_return()) +
+ if_execute_flag(
+ loop(simple_if('b', simple_if('c', [], continue_()),
+ lowered_return_simple()) +
+ break_()) +
+ if_not_return_flag(assign_x('d', const_float(1))))
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_pulled_out_jump',
+ lower_main_return=True, pull_out_jumps=True)
+
+def test_lower_breaks_1():
+ doc_string = """If a loop contains an unconditional break at the bottom of
+ it, it should not be lowered."""
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ loop(assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ break_())
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = input_sexp
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_breaks_1', lower_break=True)
+
+def test_lower_breaks_2():
+ doc_string = """If a loop contains a conditional break at the bottom of it,
+ it should not be lowered if it is in the then-clause.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ loop(assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ simple_if('b', break_()))
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = input_sexp
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_breaks_2', lower_break=True)
+
+def test_lower_breaks_3():
+ doc_string = """If a loop contains a conditional break at the bottom of it,
+ it should not be lowered if it is in the then-clause, even if
+ there are statements preceding the break.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ loop(assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ simple_if('b', (assign_x('c', const_float(1)) +
+ break_())))
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = input_sexp
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_breaks_3', lower_break=True)
+
+def test_lower_breaks_4():
+ doc_string = """If a loop contains a conditional break at the bottom of it,
+ it should not be lowered if it is in the else-clause.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ loop(assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ simple_if('b', [], break_()))
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = input_sexp
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_breaks_4', lower_break=True)
+
+def test_lower_breaks_5():
+ doc_string = """If a loop contains a conditional break at the bottom of it,
+ it should not be lowered if it is in the else-clause, even if
+ there are statements preceding the break.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ loop(assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ simple_if('b', [], (assign_x('c', const_float(1)) +
+ break_())))
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = input_sexp
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_breaks_5', lower_break=True)
+
+def test_lower_breaks_6():
+ doc_string = """If a loop contains conditional breaks and continues, and
+ ends in an unconditional break, then the unconditional break
+ needs to be lowered, because it will no longer be at the end
+ of the loop after the final break is added.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ loop(simple_if('a', (complex_if('b', continue_()) +
+ complex_if('c', break_()))) +
+ break_())
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ declare_break_flag() +
+ loop(declare_execute_flag() +
+ simple_if(
+ 'a',
+ (complex_if('b', lowered_continue()) +
+ if_execute_flag(
+ complex_if('c', lowered_break())))) +
+ if_execute_flag(lowered_break_simple()) +
+ final_break())
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_breaks_6',
+ lower_break=True, lower_continue=True)
+
+def test_lower_guarded_conditional_break():
+ doc_string = """Normally a conditional break at the end of a loop isn't
+ lowered, however if the conditional break gets placed inside
+ an if(execute_flag) because of earlier lowering of continues,
+ then the break needs to be lowered.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ loop(complex_if('a', continue_()) +
+ simple_if('b', break_()))
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ declare_break_flag() +
+ loop(declare_execute_flag() +
+ complex_if('a', lowered_continue()) +
+ if_execute_flag(simple_if('b', lowered_break())) +
+ final_break())
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'lower_guarded_conditional_break',
+ lower_break=True, lower_continue=True)
+
+def test_remove_continue_at_end_of_loop():
+ doc_string = """Test that a redundant continue-statement at the end of a
+ loop is removed.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ loop(assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ continue_())
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ loop(assign_x('a', const_float(1)))
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'remove_continue_at_end_of_loop')
+
+def test_lower_return_void_at_end_of_loop():
+ doc_string = """Test that a return of void at the end of a loop is properly
+ lowered.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ loop(assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ return_()) +
+ assign_x('b', const_float(2))
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('main', 'void', (
+ declare_return_flag() +
+ loop(assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ lowered_return_simple() +
+ break_()) +
+ if_not_return_flag(assign_x('b', const_float(2)))
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, input_sexp, 'return_void_at_end_of_loop_lower_nothing')
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'return_void_at_end_of_loop_lower_return',
+ lower_main_return=True)
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'return_void_at_end_of_loop_lower_return_and_break',
+ lower_main_return=True, lower_break=True)
+
+def test_lower_return_non_void_at_end_of_loop():
+ doc_string = """Test that a non-void return at the end of a loop is
+ properly lowered.
+ """
+ input_sexp = make_test_case('sub', 'float', (
+ loop(assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ return_(const_float(2))) +
+ assign_x('b', const_float(3)) +
+ return_(const_float(4))
+ ))
+ expected_sexp = make_test_case('sub', 'float', (
+ declare_execute_flag() +
+ declare_return_value() +
+ declare_return_flag() +
+ loop(assign_x('a', const_float(1)) +
+ lowered_return_simple(const_float(2)) +
+ break_()) +
+ if_not_return_flag(assign_x('b', const_float(3)) +
+ lowered_return(const_float(4))) +
+ final_return()
+ ))
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, input_sexp, 'return_non_void_at_end_of_loop_lower_nothing')
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'return_non_void_at_end_of_loop_lower_return',
+ lower_sub_return=True)
+ create_test_case(doc_string, input_sexp, expected_sexp, 'return_non_void_at_end_of_loop_lower_return_and_break',
+ lower_sub_return=True, lower_break=True)
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+ test_lower_returns_main()
+ test_lower_returns_sub()
+ test_lower_returns_1()
+ test_lower_returns_2()
+ test_lower_returns_3()
+ test_lower_returns_4()
+ test_lower_unified_returns()
+ test_lower_pulled_out_jump()
+ test_lower_breaks_1()
+ test_lower_breaks_2()
+ test_lower_breaks_3()
+ test_lower_breaks_4()
+ test_lower_breaks_5()
+ test_lower_breaks_6()
+ test_lower_guarded_conditional_break()
+ test_remove_continue_at_end_of_loop()
+ test_lower_return_void_at_end_of_loop()
+ test_lower_return_non_void_at_end_of_loop()