}
}
\f
-#define FRAME_SAVED_L0 0 /* Byte offset from SP */
-#define FRAME_SAVED_I0 32 /* Byte offset from SP */
+#define FRAME_SAVED_L0 0 /* Byte offset from SP */
+#define FRAME_SAVED_I0 (8 * REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (0)) /* Byte offset from SP */
CORE_ADDR
sparc_frame_chain (thisframe)
FRAME thisframe;
{
- CORE_ADDR retval;
+ REGISTER_TYPE retval;
int err;
CORE_ADDR addr;
addr = thisframe->frame + FRAME_SAVED_I0 +
- REGISTER_RAW_SIZE(FP_REGNUM) * (FP_REGNUM - I0_REGNUM);
- err = target_read_memory (addr, (char *) &retval, sizeof (CORE_ADDR));
+ REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (FP_REGNUM) * (FP_REGNUM - I0_REGNUM);
+ err = target_read_memory (addr, (char *) &retval, sizeof (REGISTER_TYPE));
if (err)
return 0;
SWAP_TARGET_AND_HOST (&retval, sizeof (retval));
frame_saved_pc (frame)
FRAME frame;
{
- CORE_ADDR prev_pc;
+ REGISTER_TYPE retval;
+ CORE_ADDR addr,prev_pc;
if (get_current_frame () == frame) /* FIXME, debug check. Remove >=gdb-4.6 */
{
if (read_register (SP_REGNUM) != frame->bottom) abort();
}
- read_memory ((CORE_ADDR) (frame->bottom + FRAME_SAVED_I0 +
- REGISTER_RAW_SIZE(I7_REGNUM) * (I7_REGNUM - I0_REGNUM)),
- (char *) &prev_pc,
- sizeof (CORE_ADDR));
+ addr = (frame->bottom + FRAME_SAVED_I0 +
+ REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (I7_REGNUM) * (I7_REGNUM - I0_REGNUM));
+ read_memory (addr, (char *) &retval, sizeof (REGISTER_TYPE));
+ SWAP_TARGET_AND_HOST (&retval, sizeof (retval));
+
+ /* CORE_ADDR isn't always the same size as REGISTER_TYPE, so convert. */
- SWAP_TARGET_AND_HOST (&prev_pc, sizeof (prev_pc));
+ prev_pc = (CORE_ADDR) retval;
return PC_ADJUST (prev_pc);
}
0x03000000, 0x82007ee0, 0x9de38001, 0x03000000,
0x82007ee0, 0x91d02001, 0x01000000 };
+/* FIXME:
+The person who wrote function calls on the SPARC didn't understand the
+SPARC stack. There is no need to call into the inferior to run a save
+instruction and then do it again for a restore instruction. Save and
+restore amount to add-to-SP and move-to-SP when all has been said and
+done. You simply modify the stack in memory to look like a function
+has been called -- the same way any other architecture does it.
+
+That would fix the sparc xfail in testsuite/gdb.t06/signals.exp, make
+function calls much faster, and would clean up some very poor code. */
+
+
/* Neither do_save_insn or do_restore_insn save stack configuration
(current_frame, etc),
since the stack is in an indeterminate state through the call to
CORE_ADDR pc;
char *name;
{
- sec_ptr s;
+ struct obj_section *s;
int retval = 0;
s = find_pc_section(pc);