# This test declares a constructor it never defines, so it's not clear how
# it would ever work?
"systemc/misc/stars/star104726",
+
+ # Another test which calls an undefined function.
+ "systemc/misc/gnats/pr-480",
+
+ # These tests rely on implicit FXVAL constructors based on primitive types,
+ # but enabling that makes other operator overloads ambiguous so things
+ # don't compile. It also seems dangerous to change what the headers look
+ # like between the backing implementation and the consuming application.
+ "systemc/datatypes/fx/fast_constructors",
+ "systemc/datatypes/fx/constructors",
),
])