+2002-02-05 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
+
+ * solib-svr4.c (svr4_truncate_ptr): New function.
+ (svr4_relocate_section_addresses): Do the address arithmetic with
+ the appropriate truncation for target addresses, even when
+ CORE_ADDR is larger than a target address.
+
2002-02-05 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* gdbserver/linux-low.c (mywait): Cast second argument of waitpid
xfree (so->lm_info);
}
+
+/* Clear any bits of ADDR that wouldn't fit in a target-format
+ data pointer. "Data pointer" here refers to whatever sort of
+ address the dynamic linker uses to manage its sections. At the
+ moment, we don't support shared libraries on any processors where
+ code and data pointers are different sizes.
+
+ This isn't really the right solution. What we really need here is
+ a way to do arithmetic on CORE_ADDR values that respects the
+ natural pointer/address correspondence. (For example, on the MIPS,
+ converting a 32-bit pointer to a 64-bit CORE_ADDR requires you to
+ sign-extend the value. There, simply truncating the bits above
+ TARGET_PTR_BIT, as we do below, is no good.) This should probably
+ be a new gdbarch method or something. */
+static CORE_ADDR
+svr4_truncate_ptr (CORE_ADDR addr)
+{
+ if (TARGET_PTR_BIT == sizeof (CORE_ADDR) * 8)
+ /* We don't need to truncate anything, and the bit twiddling below
+ will fail due to overflow problems. */
+ return addr;
+ else
+ return addr & (((CORE_ADDR) 1 << TARGET_PTR_BIT) - 1);
+}
+
+
static void
svr4_relocate_section_addresses (struct so_list *so,
struct section_table *sec)
{
- sec->addr += LM_ADDR (so);
- sec->endaddr += LM_ADDR (so);
+ sec->addr = svr4_truncate_ptr (sec->addr + LM_ADDR (so));
+ sec->endaddr = svr4_truncate_ptr (sec->endaddr + LM_ADDR (so));
}
+
/* Fetch a link_map_offsets structure for native targets using struct
definitions from link.h. See solib-legacy.c for the function
which does the actual work.