g:
497498c878d48754318e486428e2aa30854020b9 caused lra to cycle
on some SDmode reloads for power6. As explained in more detail
in the PR comments, the problem was a conflict between two target
hooks: rs6000_secondary_memory_needed_mode required SDmode FPR
reloads to use DDmode memory (rightly, since using SDmode memory
wouldn't make progress) but rs6000_can_change_mode_class didn't
allow FPRs to change from SDmode to DDmode. Previously lra
ignored that and changed the mode anyway.
From what Segher says, it sounds like the "from_size < 8 || to_size < 8"
check is mostly there for SF<->64-bit subregs, and that SDmode is stored
in the way that target-independent code expects. This patch therefore
allows SD<->DD changes.
I wondered about checking for SD<->64-bit changes instead, but that
seemed like an unnecessary generalisation for this stage.
2020-03-23 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
gcc/
PR target/94254
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_can_change_mode_class): Allow
FPRs to change between SDmode and DDmode.
+2020-03-25 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
+
+ PR target/94254
+ * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_can_change_mode_class): Allow
+ FPRs to change between SDmode and DDmode.
+
2020-03-25 Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/94131
if (!BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN && (to == TDmode || from == TDmode))
return false;
+ /* Allow SD<->DD changes, since SDmode values are stored in
+ the low half of the DDmode, just like target-independent
+ code expects. We need to allow at least SD->DD since
+ rs6000_secondary_memory_needed_mode asks for that change
+ to be made for SD reloads. */
+ if ((to == DDmode && from == SDmode)
+ || (to == SDmode && from == DDmode))
+ return true;
+
if (from_size < 8 || to_size < 8)
return false;