+1998-12-04 Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
+
+ * g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec20.C: Re-insert non-bogus ERROR marks.
+
1998-12-03 Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/overload8.C: New test.
// Build don't link:
-// According to [temp.class.spec.mfunc]/2, these are valid
+// According to the non-normative example in
+// [temp.class.spec.mfunc]/2, these should be valid, but the grammar
+// in the Standard does not allow partial nor full specializations as
+// member-declarations, so we'd better not support them.
template <class T>
struct S {
template <class U> void f(U);
- template <> void f<int>(int); // gets bogus error - XFAIL *-*-*
+ template <> void f<int>(int); // ERROR - invalid specialization
template <class V> struct I {};
template <class V> struct I<V*> {};
- template <> struct I<int>; // gets bogus error - XFAIL *-*-*
+ template <> struct I<int>; // ERROR - invalid specialization
};