2002-10-26 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
+ * i386-tdep.c (i386_extract_struct_value_address): Use
+ regcache_raw_read_unsigned instead of
+ regcache_cooked_read_unsigned since we know that the register
+ we're reading isn't a pseudo register. Rename variable 'val' into
+ the more descriptive 'addr'.
+
* x86-64-tdep.c: Fix some formatting problems, mostly in comments.
(x86_64_push_return_address): Add comment.
(x86_64_pop_frame): Make static.
}
}
-/* Extract from an array REGBUF containing the (raw) register state
- the address in which a function should return its structure value,
- as a CORE_ADDR. */
+/* Extract from REGCACHE, which contains the (raw) register state, the
+ address in which a function should return its structure value, as a
+ CORE_ADDR. */
static CORE_ADDR
i386_extract_struct_value_address (struct regcache *regcache)
{
- /* NOTE: cagney/2002-08-12: Replaced a call to
- regcache_raw_read_as_address() with a call to
- regcache_cooked_read_unsigned(). The old, ...as_address function
- was eventually calling extract_unsigned_integer (via
- extract_address) to unpack the registers value. The below is
- doing an unsigned extract so that it is functionally equivalent.
- The read needs to be cooked as, otherwise, it will never
- correctly return the value of a register in the [NUM_REGS
- .. NUM_REGS+NUM_PSEUDO_REGS) range. */
- ULONGEST val;
- regcache_cooked_read_unsigned (regcache, LOW_RETURN_REGNUM, &val);
- return val;
+ ULONGEST addr;
+
+ regcache_raw_read_unsigned (regcache, LOW_RETURN_REGNUM, &addr);
+ return addr;
}
\f