I noticed something odd while doing "stepi" over a fork syscall:
...
(gdb) set disassemble-next-line on
...
(gdb) si
0x000000323d4ba7c2 131 pid = ARCH_FORK ();
0x000000323d4ba7a4 <__libc_fork+132>: 64 4c 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 mov %fs:0x10,%r8
0x000000323d4ba7ad <__libc_fork+141>: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx
0x000000323d4ba7af <__libc_fork+143>: 4d 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 lea 0x2d0(%r8),%r10
0x000000323d4ba7b6 <__libc_fork+150>: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi
0x000000323d4ba7b8 <__libc_fork+152>: bf 11 00 20 01 mov $0x1200011,%edi
0x000000323d4ba7bd <__libc_fork+157>: b8 38 00 00 00 mov $0x38,%eax
=> 0x000000323d4ba7c2 <__libc_fork+162>: 0f 05 syscall
0x000000323d4ba7c4 <__libc_fork+164>: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax
0x000000323d4ba7ca <__libc_fork+170>: 0f 87 2b 01 00 00 ja 0x323d4ba8fb <__libc_fork+475>
(gdb) si
0x000000323d4ba7c4 131 pid = ARCH_FORK ();
0x000000323d4ba7a4 <__libc_fork+132>: 64 4c 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 mov %fs:0x10,%r8
0x000000323d4ba7ad <__libc_fork+141>: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx
0x000000323d4ba7af <__libc_fork+143>: 4d 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 lea 0x2d0(%r8),%r10
0x000000323d4ba7b6 <__libc_fork+150>: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi
0x000000323d4ba7b8 <__libc_fork+152>: bf 11 00 20 01 mov $0x1200011,%edi
0x000000323d4ba7bd <__libc_fork+157>: b8 38 00 00 00 mov $0x38,%eax
0x000000323d4ba7c2 <__libc_fork+162>: 0f 05 syscall
=> 0x000000323d4ba7c4 <__libc_fork+164>: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax
0x000000323d4ba7ca <__libc_fork+170>: 0f 87 2b 01 00 00 ja 0x323d4ba8fb <__libc_fork+475>
(gdb) si
0x000000323d4ba7c4 131 pid = ARCH_FORK ();
0x000000323d4ba7a4 <__libc_fork+132>: 64 4c 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 mov %fs:0x10,%r8
0x000000323d4ba7ad <__libc_fork+141>: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx
0x000000323d4ba7af <__libc_fork+143>: 4d 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 lea 0x2d0(%r8),%r10
0x000000323d4ba7b6 <__libc_fork+150>: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi
0x000000323d4ba7b8 <__libc_fork+152>: bf 11 00 20 01 mov $0x1200011,%edi
0x000000323d4ba7bd <__libc_fork+157>: b8 38 00 00 00 mov $0x38,%eax
0x000000323d4ba7c2 <__libc_fork+162>: 0f 05 syscall
=> 0x000000323d4ba7c4 <__libc_fork+164>: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax
0x000000323d4ba7ca <__libc_fork+170>: 0f 87 2b 01 00 00 ja 0x323d4ba8fb <__libc_fork+475>
(gdb) si
0x000000323d4ba7ca 131 pid = ARCH_FORK ();
0x000000323d4ba7a4 <__libc_fork+132>: 64 4c 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 mov %fs:0x10,%r8
0x000000323d4ba7ad <__libc_fork+141>: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx
0x000000323d4ba7af <__libc_fork+143>: 4d 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 lea 0x2d0(%r8),%r10
0x000000323d4ba7b6 <__libc_fork+150>: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi
0x000000323d4ba7b8 <__libc_fork+152>: bf 11 00 20 01 mov $0x1200011,%edi
0x000000323d4ba7bd <__libc_fork+157>: b8 38 00 00 00 mov $0x38,%eax
0x000000323d4ba7c2 <__libc_fork+162>: 0f 05 syscall
0x000000323d4ba7c4 <__libc_fork+164>: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax
=> 0x000000323d4ba7ca <__libc_fork+170>: 0f 87 2b 01 00 00 ja 0x323d4ba8fb <__libc_fork+475>
Notice how the third "si" didn't actually make progress.
Turning on infrun and lin-lwp debug, we see:
(gdb)
infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (process 5252)
infrun: proceed (addr=0xffffffffffffffff, signal=144, step=1)
infrun: resume (step=1, signal=0), trap_expected=0, current thread [process 5252] at 0x323d4ba7c4
LLR: Preparing to step process 5252, 0, inferior_ptid process 5252
RC: Not resuming sibling process 5252 (not stopped)
LLR: PTRACE_SINGLESTEP process 5252, 0 (resume event thread)
sigchld
infrun: wait_for_inferior ()
linux_nat_wait: [process -1], []
LLW: enter
LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 5252, No child processes
LLW: waitpid 5252 received Child exited (stopped)
LLW: Candidate event Child exited (stopped) in process 5252.
SEL: Select single-step process 5252
LLW: exit
infrun: target_wait (-1, status) =
infrun: 5252 [process 5252],
infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = SIGCHLD
infrun: infwait_normal_state
infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED
infrun: stop_pc = 0x323d4ba7c4
infrun: random signal 20
infrun: stepi/nexti
infrun: stop_stepping
So the inferior got a SIGCHLD (because the fork child exited while
we're doing 'si'), and since that signal is set to "nostop noprint
pass" (by default), it's considered a random signal, so it should not
cause a stop. But, it resulted in an immediate a stop_stepping call
anyway. So the single-step never really finished.
This is a regression caused by:
[[PATCH] Do not respawn signals, take 2.]
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-06/msg00702.html
Specifically, caused by this change (as mentioned in the "the lost
step issue first" part of that mail):
diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
index
53db335..
3e8dbc8 100644
--- a/gdb/infrun.c
+++ b/gdb/infrun.c
@@ -4363,10 +4363,8 @@ process_event_stop_test:
(leaving the inferior at the step-resume-breakpoint without
actually executing it). Either way continue until the
breakpoint is really hit. */
- keep_going (ecs);
- return;
}
-
+ else
/* Handle cases caused by hitting a breakpoint. */
{
That made GDB fall through to the
> /* In all-stop mode, if we're currently stepping but have stopped in
> some other thread, we need to switch back to the stepped thread. */
> if (!non_stop)
part. However, if we don't have a stepped thread to get back to,
we'll now also fall through to all the "stepping" tests. For line
stepping, that'll turn out okay, as we'll just end up realizing the
thread is still in the stepping range, and needs to be re-stepped.
However, for stepi/nexti, we'll reach:
if (ecs->event_thread->control.step_range_end == 1)
{
/* It is stepi or nexti. We always want to stop stepping after
one instruction. */
if (debug_infrun)
fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "infrun: stepi/nexti\n");
ecs->event_thread->control.stop_step = 1;
print_end_stepping_range_reason ();
stop_stepping (ecs);
return;
}
and stop, even though the thread actually made no progress. The fix
is to restore the keep_going call, but put it after the "switch back
to the stepped thread" code, and before the stepping tests.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 17, native and gdbserver. New test included.
gdb/
2013-10-18 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR gdb/16062
* infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Keep going if we got a random
signal we should not stop for, instead of falling through to the
step tests.
gdb/testsuite/
2013-10-18 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR gdb/16062
* gdb.threads/stepi-random-signal.c: New file.
* gdb.threads/stepi-random-signal.exp: New file.
+2013-10-18 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
+
+ PR gdb/16062
+ * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Keep going if we got a random
+ signal we should not stop for, instead of falling through to the
+ step tests.
+
2013-10-18 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* c-varobj.c (cplus_number_of_children): Fix indentation.
}
}
+ if (ecs->random_signal)
+ {
+ if (debug_infrun)
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
+ "infrun: random signal, keep going\n");
+
+ /* Signal not stepping related. */
+ keep_going (ecs);
+ return;
+ }
+
if (ecs->event_thread->control.step_resume_breakpoint)
{
if (debug_infrun)
+2013-10-18 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
+
+ PR gdb/16062
+ * gdb.threads/stepi-random-signal.c: New file.
+ * gdb.threads/stepi-random-signal.exp: New file.
+
2013-10-17 Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@codesourcery.com>
* gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-changed.exp (test_insert_delete_modify):
--- /dev/null
+/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
+
+ Copyright 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+static pthread_t main_thread;
+
+static void *
+start (void *arg)
+{
+ /* A signal whose default action is ignore. */
+ pthread_kill (main_thread, SIGCHLD);
+
+ while (1)
+ sleep (1); /* set break here */
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ unsigned int counter = 1;
+ pthread_t thread;
+
+ main_thread = pthread_self ();
+ pthread_create (&thread, NULL, start, NULL);
+
+ while (counter != 0)
+ counter++; /* set break 2 here */
+
+ return 0;
+}
--- /dev/null
+# Copyright 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+standard_testfile
+set executable ${testfile}
+
+if { [gdb_compile_pthreads \
+ "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" \
+ "${binfile}" \
+ executable {debug}] != "" } {
+ untested "Couldn't compile test program."
+ return -1
+}
+
+clean_restart $executable
+
+# Start the second thread.
+if ![runto start] {
+ return -1
+}
+
+# Go back to the main thread, and leave it in the loop, where we're
+# reasonably sure we don't have 'conditional jmp $pc'-like
+# instructions. We wouldn't be able to detect whether a stepi makes
+# progress over those.
+gdb_test_no_output "set scheduler-locking on"
+gdb_test "thread 1" "Switching to .*"
+gdb_breakpoint $srcfile:[gdb_get_line_number "set break 2 here"]
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "loop" ".* set break 2 here .*"
+
+# Now back to thread 2, and let it queue a signal in thread 1.
+gdb_test "thread 2" "Switching to .*"
+gdb_breakpoint $srcfile:[gdb_get_line_number "set break here"]
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "after pthread_kill" ".* set break here .*"
+
+# We're now ready to stepi thread 1. It should immediately dequeue
+# the signal.
+gdb_test "thread 1" "Switching to .*" "thread 1 again"
+
+# No longer need these.
+delete_breakpoints
+
+# Turn on infrun debugging, so we can tell whether the signal is
+# really dequeued and that GDB sees it.
+gdb_test_no_output "set debug infrun 1"
+
+# Helper to extract the current PC. PREFIX is used to make each call
+# have its own unique test name.
+
+proc get_pc { prefix } {
+ with_test_prefix "$prefix" {
+ return [get_hexadecimal_valueof "\$pc" ""]
+ }
+}
+
+set prev_addr [get_pc "before stepi"]
+if {$prev_addr == ""} {
+ return
+}
+
+# True if we saw the infrun path we want to test be exercised.
+set seen 0
+
+set test "stepi"
+if {[gdb_test_multiple "stepi" "$test" {
+ -re "infrun: random signal" {
+ set seen 1
+ exp_continue
+ }
+ -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
+ }
+}] != 0} {
+ return
+}
+
+if {$seen} {
+ pass "$test"
+} else {
+ fail "$test (no random signal)"
+}
+
+set addr [get_pc "after stepi"]
+if {$addr == ""} {
+ return
+}
+
+set test "stepi interfered by signal makes progress"
+if {$addr == $prev_addr} {
+ fail "$test"
+} else {
+ pass "$test"
+}
projects / binutils-gdb.git / commitdiff