+2003-12-12 Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com>
+
+ PR optimization/13037
+ * loop.c (update_giv_derive): Ignore redundant sets of a biv when
+ calculating how to derive a giv from a biv.
+
2003-12-12 Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
PR preprocessor/12935 preprocessor/12952 preprocessor/13046
if (GET_CODE (p) == CODE_LABEL || GET_CODE (p) == JUMP_INSN
|| biv->insn == p)
{
+ /* Skip if location is the same as a previous one. */
+ if (biv->same)
+ continue;
+
for (giv = bl->giv; giv; giv = giv->next_iv)
{
/* If cant_derive is already true, there is no point in
+2003-12-12 Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com>
+
+ PR optimization/13037
+ * g77.f-torture/execute/13037.f: New test case.
+
2003-12-12 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
PR c++/12881
--- /dev/null
+c PR optimization/13037
+c Contributed by Kirill Smelkov
+c bug symptom: zeta(kkzc) seems to reference to zeta(kkzc-1) instead
+c with gcc-3.2.2 it is OK, so it is a regression.
+c
+ subroutine bug1(expnt)
+ implicit none
+
+ double precision zeta
+ common /bug1_area/zeta(3)
+
+ double precision expnt(3)
+
+
+ integer k, kkzc
+
+ kkzc=0
+ do k=1,3
+ kkzc = kkzc + 1
+ zeta(kkzc) = expnt(k)
+ enddo
+
+c the following line activates the bug
+ call bug1_activator(kkzc)
+ end
+
+
+c dummy subroutine
+ subroutine bug1_activator(inum)
+ implicit none
+ integer inum
+ end
+
+
+c test driver
+ program test_bug1
+ implicit none
+
+ double precision zeta
+ common /bug1_area/zeta(3)
+
+ double precision expnt(3)
+
+ zeta(1) = 0.0d0
+ zeta(2) = 0.0d0
+ zeta(3) = 0.0d0
+
+ expnt(1) = 1.0d0
+ expnt(2) = 2.0d0
+ expnt(3) = 3.0d0
+
+ call bug1(expnt)
+ if ((zeta(1).ne.1) .or. (zeta(2).ne.2) .or. (zeta(3).ne.3)) then
+ call abort
+ endif
+
+ end
+