re PR tree-optimization/46021 (3 tree-ssa tests XPASS almost everywhere)

2011-09-07  Jiangning Liu  <jiangning.liu@arm.com>

	PR tree-optimization/46021
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on arm*-*-*.

From-SVN: r178628

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index e6dce4ea45d2faaa455cc639034892aedd61df31..04d41dcb5116188c379e4a75e1aa1145de6060e2 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2011-09-07  Jiangning Liu  <jiangning.liu@arm.com>
+
+       PR tree-optimization/46021
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on arm*-*-*.
+
 2011-09-06  Michael Meissner  <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 
        * g++.dg/ext/altivec-17.C: Fix dg-error to match current compiler.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
index 45e44a1b26a216180465a168574b2aa5b60b620b..470b585fd534a82122aa3290d583de1452582869 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
@@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ void test55 (int x, int y)
    that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST).  Fix this
    by teaching dom to look through && and register all components
    as true.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */