x86: Rename match_reg_size to match_operand_size

match_reg_size checks size for both memory and register operands.  This
patch renamed match_reg_size to match_operand_size and updated comments
for

commit 3ac21baa8498d3aa9951f79e2c3336d532eeff7b
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Date:   Mon Jul 16 08:19:21 2018 +0200

    x86: fix operand size checking

which added one argument to match_reg_size, match_simd_size and
match_mem_size.

	* config/tc-i386.c (match_reg_size): Renamed to ...
	(match_operand_size): This.  Update comments.
	(match_simd_size): Update comments.  Replace match_reg_size
	with match_operand_size.
	(match_mem_size): Likewise.
	(operand_size_match): Replace match_reg_size with
	match_operand_size.

diff --git a/gas/ChangeLog b/gas/ChangeLog
index a612f71b43c94e3f5d2d3c9b83a733184c24f8ab..bee9664ad19315335c39c0507762f657caf9262d 100644 (file)
--- a/gas/ChangeLog
+++ b/gas/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+2018-07-20  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+       * config/tc-i386.c (match_reg_size): Renamed to ...
+       (match_operand_size): This.  Update comments.
+       (match_simd_size): Update comments.  Replace match_reg_size
+       with match_operand_size.
+       (match_mem_size): Likewise.
+       (operand_size_match): Replace match_reg_size with
+       match_operand_size.
+
 2018-07-20  Chenghua Xu  <paul.hua.gm@gmail.com>
            Maciej W. Rozycki  <macro@mips.com>
 

diff --git a/gas/config/tc-i386.c b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
index 41f701c3d88dd05c9f5e28d2ed455af50d38c488..02de778397dbac0180470b0e3b296391e8a48b6f 100644 (file)
--- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
@@ -1897,11 +1897,12 @@ operand_type_check (i386_operand_type t, enum operand_type c)
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* Return 1 if there is no conflict in 8bit/16bit/32bit/64bit/80bit on
-   operand J for instruction template T.  */
+/* Return 1 if there is no conflict in 8bit/16bit/32bit/64bit/80bit size
+   between operand GIVEN and opeand WANTED for instruction template T.  */
 
 static INLINE int
-match_reg_size (const insn_template *t, unsigned int wanted, unsigned int given)
+match_operand_size (const insn_template *t, unsigned int wanted,
+                   unsigned int given)
 {
   return !((i.types[given].bitfield.byte
            && !t->operand_types[wanted].bitfield.byte)
@@ -1915,8 +1916,8 @@ match_reg_size (const insn_template *t, unsigned int wanted, unsigned int given)
               && !t->operand_types[wanted].bitfield.tbyte));
 }
 
-/* Return 1 if there is no conflict in SIMD register on
-   operand J for instruction template T.  */
+/* Return 1 if there is no conflict in SIMD register between operand GIVEN
+   and opeand WANTED for instruction template T.  */
 
 static INLINE int
 match_simd_size (const insn_template *t, unsigned int wanted, unsigned int given)
@@ -1929,13 +1930,13 @@ match_simd_size (const insn_template *t, unsigned int wanted, unsigned int given
               && !t->operand_types[wanted].bitfield.zmmword));
 }
 
-/* Return 1 if there is no conflict in any size on operand J for
-   instruction template T.  */
+/* Return 1 if there is no conflict in any size between operand GIVEN
+   and opeand WANTED for instruction template T.  */
 
 static INLINE int
 match_mem_size (const insn_template *t, unsigned int wanted, unsigned int given)
 {
-  return (match_reg_size (t, wanted, given)
+  return (match_operand_size (t, wanted, given)
          && !((i.types[given].bitfield.unspecified
                && !i.broadcast
                && !t->operand_types[wanted].bitfield.unspecified)
@@ -1985,7 +1986,7 @@ operand_size_match (const insn_template *t)
        continue;
 
       if (t->operand_types[j].bitfield.reg
-         && !match_reg_size (t, j, j))
+         && !match_operand_size (t, j, j))
        {
          match = 0;
          break;
@@ -1999,7 +2000,7 @@ operand_size_match (const insn_template *t)
        }
 
       if (t->operand_types[j].bitfield.acc
-         && (!match_reg_size (t, j, j) || !match_simd_size (t, j, j)))
+         && (!match_operand_size (t, j, j) || !match_simd_size (t, j, j)))
        {
          match = 0;
          break;
@@ -2027,7 +2028,7 @@ mismatch:
     {
       if ((t->operand_types[j].bitfield.reg
           || t->operand_types[j].bitfield.acc)
-         && !match_reg_size (t, j, !j))
+         && !match_operand_size (t, j, !j))
        goto mismatch;
 
       if (i.types[!j].bitfield.mem