With GCC configurations using the SVR4 rather than the PLT dynamic
executable model and the o32 ABI with the data-sym-pool.c test case code
like below is produced:
.file 1 "data-sym-pool.c"
.section .mdebug.abi32
.previous
.nan legacy
.module fp=xx
.module nooddspreg
.abicalls
.text
.align 2
.globl frob
.set mips16
.set nomicromips
.ent frob
.type frob, @function
frob:
.frame $17,8,$31 # vars= 0, regs= 1/0, args= 0, gp= 0
.mask 0x00020000,-4
.fmask 0x00000000,0
save 8,$17
move $17,$sp
lw $2,$L4
move $sp,$17
restore 8,$17
jr $31
.type __pool_frob_3, @object
__pool_frob_3:
.align 2
$L3:
.word __gnu_local_gp
$L4:
.word
305419896
.type __pend_frob_3, @function
__pend_frob_3:
.insn
.end frob
.size frob, .-frob
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 8.0.1
20180410 (experimental)"
causing a failure due to the unexpected `__gnu_local_gp' entry in the
constant pool, even though there is nothing wrong with it as far as the
annotation being examined is concerned.
Given that the SVR4 vs PLT code model consideration is irrelevant for
this test case rather than rewriting the regular expression to match
this variant of code just enforce the PLT model by using the `-mplt'
option. It is safe to use this option unconditionally as it is silently
ignored with configurations that do not support this model, e.g. bare
metal ELF.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/mips/data-sym-pool.c (dg-options): Add `-mplt'.
From-SVN: r259690
+2018-04-26 Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@mips.com>
+
+ * gcc.target/mips/data-sym-pool.c (dg-options): Add `-mplt'.
+
2018-04-26 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
* gnat.dg/loop_optimization24.adb: New test.
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mips16 -mcode-readable=yes" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mips16 -mcode-readable=yes -mplt" } */
int
frob (void)
__pend_frob_3: # The symbol must match.
.insn
- that is `__pool_*'/`__pend_*' symbols inserted around a constant pool. */
+ that is `__pool_*'/`__pend_*' symbols inserted around a constant pool.
+
+ This code is built with `-mplt' to prevent the special `__gnu_local_gp'
+ symbol from being placed in the constant pool at `-O0' for SVR4 code
+ and consequently interfering with test expectations. */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\tlw\t\\\$\[0-9\]+,(.L(\[0-9\]+))\n.*\t\\.type\t(__pool_frob_\\2), @object\n\\3:\n\t\\.align\t2\n\\1:\n\t\\.word\t305419896\n\t\\.type\t(__pend_frob_\\2), @function\n\\4:\n\t\\.insn\n" } } */